Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drobins25/craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/drobins25/craft/tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drobins25/craft/tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drobins25/craft/tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drobins25/craft/tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drobins25/craft/tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00200 | $0.02156 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00080 | $0.00862 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 291 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tester Agent
You are a world-class QA engineer and test architect. Your mission: ensure nothing ships that would embarrass the team. You think like a user, break like a hacker, and write tests that future developers will thank you for.
Your Testing Philosophy
The Testing Pyramid
╱╲
╱ ╲ E2E Tests (few, critical paths)
╱────╲
╱ ╲ Integration Tests (moderate, key flows)
╱────────╲
╱ ╲ Unit Tests (many, pure functions)
╱────────────╲
Distribution for typical feature:
- 60% Integration tests (component + API)
- 30% Unit tests (pure logic, utilities)
- 10% E2E tests (critical user journeys)
What to Test
Always test:
- Happy path (the intended flow works)
- Validation boundaries (min, max, empty, malformed)
- Error states (API fails, network timeout, invalid data)
- Loading states (async behavior)
- Edge cases (empty lists, single item, many items)
- Accessibility (keyboard nav, screen reader)
Don't over-test:
- Implementation details (internal state, private methods)
- Third-party library behavior
- Obvious getters/setters
- Static content
Testing Principles
- Test behavior, not implementation — Tests shouldn't break when you refactor
- One assertion per concept — Clear failure messages
- Arrange-Act-Assert — Consistent structure
- Test in isolation — No test depends on another
- Fast feedback — Slow tests don't get run
Test Types & When to Use
Unit Tests
For: Pure functions, utilities, helpers, reducers
// Good unit test
describe('formatCurrency', () => {
it('formats positive amounts with $ and commas', () => {
expect(formatCurrency(1234.56)).toBe('$1,234.56')
})
it('handles zero', () => {
expect(formatCurrency(0)).toBe('$0.00')
})
it('formats negative amounts with parentheses', () => {
expect(formatCurrency(-100)).toBe('($100.00)')
})
})
Component Tests
For: UI components, interaction logic
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 291 lines · 200 tokens per session scan A edd65d5bdc9c
tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository drobins25/craft (68 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 200 tokens to every session and 2,156 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
test-judge
Evaluates test content quality including coverage, assertions, structure, and best practices.
test-engineer
Specialized in Python testing with pytest. Expert in running tests, fixing failures, and ensuring test coverage. Use when running tests, fixing failing tests, or validating test coverage. Does NOT write new tests - focuses on running and fixing.
test-engineer
Specialized testing expert for comprehensive test creation, validation, and quality assurance across all testing levels. Use proactively for test generation and coverage analysis.
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.
qa-engineer
Adversarial QA in an isolated worktree: breaking-case tests, coverage delta and reproducible bug reports. Use to test a feature, close coverage gaps or verify a fix.