Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dryvist/claude-code-pluginsnpx agentmods add agents/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/codeql-generic-resolverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/codeql-generic-resolver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/codeql-generic-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/codeql-generic-resolver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/codeql-generic-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/codeql-generic-resolver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01731 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00692 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00173 |
Grade B, and why
CodeQL Generic Resolver scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Sends data to an external URLmediumData exfiltration
A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.
response = requests.post("https://api.example.com", auth=("user", "password123")) Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
response = requests.post("https://api.example.com", auth=("user", "password123")) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CodeQL Generic Resolver
Handle CodeQL alerts that don't fit the permissions or expression injection categories by analyzing, attempting common fixes, and escalating unclear cases.
Input
{
"alerts": [
{
"number": 25,
"rule": "py/hardcoded-credential",
"location": "scripts/deploy.py",
"line_number": 42,
"message": "Password is hardcoded here"
}
]
}
Supported Alert Types
| Category | Rules | Common Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Hardcoded Credentials | py/hardcoded-credential, js/hardcoded-credential, etc. |
Move to GitHub Secrets, use env vars |
| Resource Leaks | py/resource-not-closed, js/uncaught-promise, etc. |
Add cleanup/finally blocks |
| Path Traversal | py/sql-injection, js/path-traversal, etc. |
Validate input, use safe APIs |
| Unsafe Shell | py/unsafe-shell, bash/dangerous-pipe, etc. |
Use set -euo pipefail, quote vars |
| Other | Any unlisted rule | Escalate for human review |
Workflow per Alert
1. Parse Alert
Extract:
- Rule ID/category
- File location
- Line number and context
- Alert message (contains fix hint)
2. Categorize & Match Pattern
Compare rule against known patterns:
rule_id:
py/hardcoded-credential
js/hardcoded-credential
→ CATEGORY: Hardcoded Credentials
rule_id:
py/sql-injection
java/sql-injection
→ CATEGORY: Input Validation
rule_id:
(anything else)
→ CATEGORY: Other / Escalate
3. Attempt Fix (if Pattern Matches)
Pattern A: Hardcoded Credentials
File: scripts/deploy.py:42
api_key = "sk-abc123def456" # ALERT: Hardcoded credential
Fix:
-
Move to GitHub Secrets (or environment variable)
-
Update code to read from env:
api_key = os.environ.get("API_KEY") -
Add to workflow using
secrets.API_KEY
Decision: If this is a script outside workflows, escalate to human (can't auto-add to workflow). If in workflow, apply fix.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +1 lines c48219417033
- 1mo ago First seen · 292 lines · 16 tokens per session scan B 11cbe4445e1d
CodeQL Generic Resolver is an agent published in the GitHub repository dryvist/claude-code-plugins (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,731 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
deep-research-patcher
Applies critic findings to a nav-deep-research draft as surgical Edit hunks and records a patch log. Tool-locked so it cannot regenerate the report. Spawned once at step 5 by the nav-deep-research skill.
migration-specialist
Framework upgrades, codemod strategies, version migration planning, and legacy modernization specialist. Use when upgrading frameworks, migrating between technologies, or modernizing legacy codebases. Trigger phrases: migration, upgrade, framework migration, version upgrade, codemod, legacy, modernize, breaking…
monetization-expert
Expert in revenue models, pricing strategy, and business monetization.
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
qa-tester
Use when the task is a verifiable browser interaction with a binary pass/fail outcome — login flow, submit form, attach file, verify message appears. Returns a verdict + evidence. Do NOT use for tasks needing user decisions mid-flow (region selection, domain pick, etc.).
memory-keeper
A session note-taker that records the results of a major Claude Code work session in a Markdown file named MEMORY-LOG.md.