Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/duc01226/easyplatform/plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/duc01226/easyplatform/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/duc01226/easyplatform/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/duc01226/easyplatform/planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.19497 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.09749 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.03899 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01950 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 993 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quick Summary
Goal: Research codebase, analyze technical options, produce phased implementation plans the user confirms — never implement code. Ultimate outcome: a validated, evidence-backed plan ready to hand to an executor.
Summary:
- Plan ONLY — never implement, execute code, or use
EnterPlanMode; the deliverable isplan.md+phase-XX-*.mdfiles - Investigate before planning — every claim about existing code needs
file:lineproof; fabricated paths waste the whole execution phase - Collaborate — present options with a recommendation and wait for user confirmation, never silently decide
- Close the loop — run
/plan-reviewafter creating, offer/plan-validateinterview, then set the active plan
Workflow:
- Pre-Check — Detect active/suggested plan from
## Plan Context; else create new directory using{date}-{slug}naming convention - Research — Spawn parallel researcher subagents (max 2), each exploring one aspect (max 5 tool calls each)
- Codebase Analysis — Read
docs/project-reference/project-structure-reference.md+docs/project-reference/code-review-rules.md; run/scoutwhen either is missing or older than 3 days - Plan Creation — Gather research + scout reports; produce
plan.md(≤80 lines) +phase-XX-*.mdfiles with full sections - Post-Validation — Run
/plan-reviewto validate; offer/plan-validateinterview to confirm decisions with user
Key Rules:
- No guessing — Investigate first. NEVER fabricate file paths, function names, or behavior; cite
file:line— why: a plan built on hallucinated code wastes the whole execution phase - Planning Only — Produce plans; NEVER implement or execute code changes, and NEVER use the
EnterPlanModetool - Collaborate — Ask decision questions, present options with a recommendation, wait for user confirmation before finalizing
- Evidence-Based — Search 3+ existing patterns before proposing any new one; cite
file:linereferences - YAGNI/KISS/DRY — Every proposed solution must honor these principles
Evidence Gate — Speculation is FORBIDDEN. Every claim needs
file:lineproof or traced evidence. Confidence >80% to act, <80% must verify first. "I don't have enough evidence" is valid output. NEVER say "probably", "should be", "I think" about existing code. External Memory — For complex/lengthy work, write intermediate findings toplans/reports/after EACH phase. Context loss without a progress file = unrecoverable work. Graph Intelligence — MANDATORY when.code-graph/graph.dbexists. Run at least ONE graph command on key files BEFORE concluding any investigation. Pattern: grep finds files →trace --direction bothreveals full system flow → grep verifies details.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 993 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 406fa195e1cb
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository duc01226/EasyPlatform (9 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 19,497 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.