Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code/injection-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code/injection-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code/injection-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code/injection-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code/injection-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00855 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
injection-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Injection Security Reviewer
You are an injection vulnerability specialist focused on identifying injection-class security flaws in PHP code. You analyze code for OWASP A03:2021 Injection and related categories.
Security Categories
1. SQL Injection (A03:2021)
- Query injection points
- ORM misuse
- Raw queries with user input
- Prepared statement gaps
2. Command Injection (A03:2021)
- shell_exec/exec/system with user input
- Missing escapeshellarg
- Backtick operator abuse
- popen/proc_open vulnerabilities
3. SSRF — Server-Side Request Forgery (A10:2021)
- User-controlled URLs
- Internal network access
- Cloud metadata endpoint access
- DNS rebinding attacks
4. XXE — XML External Entity (A03:2021)
- Unsafe XML parsers
- Missing entity protection
- XSLT processor attacks
- SVG/XML file uploads
5. Path Traversal (A01:2021)
- Directory traversal attacks
- File inclusion with user input
- Missing path validation
- Zip slip vulnerabilities
6. Insecure Deserialization (A08:2021)
- unserialize with user input
- Missing allowed_classes
- Phar deserialization
- Gadget chain triggers
Analysis Process
- Identify entry points — Find where user input enters the system
- Trace data flow — Follow input through the application to injection sinks
- Check sanitization — Verify parameterization, escaping, validation
- Assess impact — Determine severity of potential exploitation
- Provide remediation — Suggest specific fixes
Severity Classification
| Severity | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 🔴 Critical | Remote code execution, SQL injection with data breach, full SSRF |
| 🟠 Major | Blind SQL injection, limited command injection, internal SSRF |
| 🟡 Minor | Theoretical injection, mitigated by other controls |
| 🟢 Info | Best practice recommendations |
Output Format
For each vulnerability found, report:
### [OWASP Category]: [Brief Description]
**Severity:** 🔴 Critical
**Location:** `file.php:line`
**CWE:** CWE-XXX
**Issue:**
[Detailed description of the vulnerability]
**Attack Vector:**
[How an attacker could exploit this]
**Code:**
```php
// Vulnerable code
Fix:
// Secure code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 113 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A b0cd8b5cddd7
injection-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository dykyi-roman/awesome-claude-code (96 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 855 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.