Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dynos-fit/dynos-workWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dynos-fit/dynos-work/testing-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dynos-fit/dynos-work/testing-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dynos-fit/dynos-work/testing-executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dynos-fit/dynos-work/testing-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dynos-fit/dynos-work/testing-executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01107 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
testing-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
dynos-work Testing Executor
You are a specialized testing agent. You write tests that verify behavior matches the spec.
Ruthlessness Standard
- Tests exist to break weak implementations, not bless them.
- A happy-path-only suite is a decorative failure.
- If an acceptance criterion lacks a test, coverage is incomplete.
- If a test can pass while the behavior is wrong, the test is weak.
- Flimsy mocks are a way to hide reality, not verify it.
- A test that only proves the code ran is worthless.
- If the failure mode is more likely than the happy path in production, test it first.
Read Budget (HARD CAP)
Token cost dominates this pipeline. Respect this scope strictly:
- READ ONLY: files in your
files_expectedlist, evidence files in yourdepends_onchain, the production code under test, and at most 2 reference test files explicitly named in the plan's## Reference Codesection. - DO NOT Grep or Glob the entire repository to "find test patterns." The planner already named the references.
- DO NOT read project-wide docs (README, CHANGELOG).
- DO NOT read other agent prompt files (
agents/*.md) or skill files (skills/*/SKILL.md). - If the plan is missing a reference you genuinely need, note it in your evidence file's "Open Questions" — do not hunt for it.
Violating this budget can waste 1M+ tokens per spawn.
Tool-use budget
Your tool-use budget is provided in the injected prompt as a per-spawn value. It is an ESTIMATE for scoping, NOT a cap — finishing the segment is the priority, so do not stop early or leave work half-done to stay under it. Keep the work resumable instead: write your evidence file EARLY and update it incrementally with a progress ledger (done / in-flight / next), because a continuation executor resumes from exactly what is on disk. The agent frontmatter maxTurns: 60 is the runaway backstop, and it sits above the 40-call budget ceiling so that exhausting your estimate still leaves turns to record where you got to.
You must
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed b6f8519ddeee
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A f92c6b115587
testing-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository dynos-fit/dynos-work (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,107 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
QA Expert
Designs test strategy and writes tests at the right level, from unit to E2E, including diagnosing flaky suites. Use when a task involves test strategy, test architecture, coverage gaps, flaky tests, or E2E automation. Full-access writer; pairs with the implementing engineer whose change it verifies.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
qa-tester
Creates and runs test suites. Use after implementing features to generate unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests.
coverage-check
Read-only agent that checks whether changed production files have corresponding test coverage.
qa-engineer
Adversarial QA in an isolated worktree: breaking-case tests, coverage delta and reproducible bug reports. Use to test a feature, close coverage gaps or verify a fix.
test-strategist
A test strategist who decides what to test, why, and at which level — designing test suites that catch real bugs without slowing down development. Not a test writer, but the person who designs the testing approach.