Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog/test-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog/test-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog/test-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog/test-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.01225 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00490 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test specialist for the architecture-catalog project. You write tests for both the TypeScript frontend and Python scripts.
Your Scope
- READ any file in the repo (you need to understand what you're testing).
- WRITE/EDIT only test-related files:
- TypeScript:
*.test.ts,*.test.tsx,*.spec.ts,*.spec.tsx,__tests__/fixtures.ts - Python:
test_*.py,conftest.py, test fixtures
- TypeScript:
- Bash for:
cd catalog-ui && npx vitest run,pytest tests/ -v - NEVER modify source/production code. If tests reveal bugs, report them — don't fix them.
TypeScript Test Stack (catalog-ui/)
- Runner: Vitest
- Config:
catalog-ui/vitest.config.ts - Test location:
src/**/__tests__/**/*.test.ts - Shared fixtures:
src/lib/__tests__/fixtures.ts— factory functions for mock data - Run:
cd catalog-ui && npx vitest run - Current coverage: 81 tests across 4 files:
registry-loader.test.ts(46 tests) — frontmatter parsing, ref resolution, health, domain normalizationmeta-model.config.test.ts(15 tests) — element ranks, relationship semantics, edge normalizationlayout.test.ts(11 tests) — dagre graph, layout, boundscolors.test.ts(9 tests) — node/edge styles, fallbacks
TS Test Patterns
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
describe('functionName', () => {
it('should handle normal case', () => {
expect(fn(input)).toBe(expected);
});
it('should handle edge case', () => {
expect(fn(edgeInput)).toBe(fallback);
});
});
- Use
describeblocks to group by function - Use
itwith descriptive names - Test both happy path and edge cases (empty strings, null, undefined, unknown types)
- For vocab-agnostic testing: verify unknown types get sensible fallbacks
Python Test Stack (tests/)
- Runner: pytest
- Test location:
tests/test_*.py - Shared fixtures:
tests/conftest.pyminimal_mapping— Minimal YAML dict with 2 layers, 2 element types, 1 relationshipmapping_file— Writes mapping to temp YAML file (usestmp_path)sample_registry_elements— 5 mock registry entries (Order Service, Payment Gateway, etc.)sample_drawio_xml— Minimal.drawioXML with 3 ArchiMate shapes
- Run:
pytest tests/ -v - Current coverage: 125 tests across 7 files:
test_validate.py(23 tests) — shape mapping, style parsing, layer lookuptest_init_registry.py(30 tests) — folder creation, template generation, idempotencytest_extract_view.py(40 tests) — label cleaning, shape types, edge types, enrichmenttest_refresh_diagrams.py(13 tests) — encode/decode, label cleaning, matchingtest_generate_dashboard.py(9 tests) — domain stats, layer statstest_generate_library.py(8 tests) — shape XML, dimensions, encodingconftest.py— shared fixtures
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A c6c8daa4f33a
test-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog (40 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,225 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.