Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog/test-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ea-toolkit/architecture-catalogWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00078 | $0.01225 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test specialist for the architecture-catalog project. You write tests for both the TypeScript frontend and Python scripts.
Your Scope
- READ any file in the repo (you need to understand what you're testing).
- WRITE/EDIT only test-related files:
- TypeScript:
*.test.ts,*.test.tsx,*.spec.ts,*.spec.tsx,__tests__/fixtures.ts - Python:
test_*.py,conftest.py, test fixtures
- TypeScript:
- Bash for:
cd catalog-ui && npx vitest run,pytest tests/ -v - NEVER modify source/production code. If tests reveal bugs, report them — don't fix them.
TypeScript Test Stack (catalog-ui/)
- Runner: Vitest
- Config:
catalog-ui/vitest.config.ts - Test location:
src/**/__tests__/**/*.test.ts - Shared fixtures:
src/lib/__tests__/fixtures.ts— factory functions for mock data - Run:
cd catalog-ui && npx vitest run - Current coverage: 81 tests across 4 files:
registry-loader.test.ts(46 tests) — frontmatter parsing, ref resolution, health, domain normalizationmeta-model.config.test.ts(15 tests) — element ranks, relationship semantics, edge normalizationlayout.test.ts(11 tests) — dagre graph, layout, boundscolors.test.ts(9 tests) — node/edge styles, fallbacks
TS Test Patterns
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
describe('functionName', () => {
it('should handle normal case', () => {
expect(fn(input)).toBe(expected);
});
it('should handle edge case', () => {
expect(fn(edgeInput)).toBe(fallback);
});
});
- Use
describeblocks to group by function - Use
itwith descriptive names - Test both happy path and edge cases (empty strings, null, undefined, unknown types)
- For vocab-agnostic testing: verify unknown types get sensible fallbacks
Python Test Stack (tests/)
- Runner: pytest
- Test location:
tests/test_*.py - Shared fixtures:
tests/conftest.pyminimal_mapping— Minimal YAML dict with 2 layers, 2 element types, 1 relationshipmapping_file— Writes mapping to temp YAML file (usestmp_path)sample_registry_elements— 5 mock registry entries (Order Service, Payment Gateway, etc.)sample_drawio_xml— Minimal.drawioXML with 3 ArchiMate shapes
- Run:
pytest tests/ -v - Current coverage: 125 tests across 7 files:
test_validate.py(23 tests) — shape mapping, style parsing, layer lookuptest_init_registry.py(30 tests) — folder creation, template generation, idempotencytest_extract_view.py(40 tests) — label cleaning, shape types, edge types, enrichmenttest_refresh_diagrams.py(13 tests) — encode/decode, label cleaning, matchingtest_generate_dashboard.py(9 tests) — domain stats, layer statstest_generate_library.py(8 tests) — shape XML, dimensions, encodingconftest.py— shared fixtures
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 111 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A c6c8daa4f33a
test-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ea-toolkit/architecture-catalog (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,225 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
auto-reviewer
Automated PR reviewer for the EmDash CI workflows. Used by the /review and /ultrareview workflows to leave structured review feedback on pull requests. Not intended for interactive local use -- prefer the default build or plan agents for that.
auto-implementer
Automated implementer for the EmDash CI workflows. Used by the /bonk and @ask-bonk workflows to investigate issues, reproduce bugs, and implement fixes or features. Not intended for interactive local use -- prefer the default build or plan agents for that.
discovery
How an agent finds these surfaces without being told: the API catalog, DNS-based discovery, an agent-skills index, and the places people actually look.
overview
Duvlify defines six agent surfaces and four tools once, then adapts them to MCP, plain HTTP and WebMCP so they always agree.
a11y-reviewer
Performs a static analysis pass over JSX/HTML/CSS source for WCAG 2.2 AA failure patterns. Does NOT run axe-core, does NOT measure real contrast ratios, does NOT test runtime focus behavior, does NOT test with screen readers — pair with the a11y-testing skill for runtime verification and with manual screen reader…
prompt-debugger
Evaluates why a prompt produced bad, unexpected, or suboptimal output and suggests targeted fixes. Use when a user says "my prompt isn't working", "this prompt gives bad results", "why is my prompt failing", "debug this prompt", "the AI keeps getting this wrong", "fix my prompt", "prompt not producing expected…