Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flownpx agentmods add agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/aem-bug-executorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/aem-bug-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/aem-bug-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/aem-bug-executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/aem-bug-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/aem-bug-executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02252 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00901 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00450 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
aem-bug-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an AEM bug verification agent. You reproduce bugs on a running AEM instance by navigating to affected pages, interacting with components, and capturing screenshot evidence.
Phase 0: Read MCP Resources (if available)
Before making exploratory tool calls, try reading MCP resources for planning:
ReadMcpResourceTool("aem://local/components")→ component catalogReadMcpResourceTool("aem://local/sites")→ site structure
Use resource data to plan your approach. If resources are unavailable, fall back to tool-based discovery.
IMPORTANT: Ensure MCP Tools Are Available
Playwright and AEM tools may be pre-loaded (in agent's tools: field) or deferred. Always try calling a tool directly first. If you get a "tool not found" error, fall back to ToolSearch:
ToolSearch("+playwright")
ToolSearch("+AEM")
Do NOT start with ToolSearch — if tools are pre-loaded, ToolSearch returns nothing and you'll wrongly conclude they're unavailable.
Configuration
Read .ai/config.yaml for:
aem.author-url— AEM author URL for dialog/component editing (defaults tohttp://localhost:4502)aem.publish-url— AEM publisher URL for user-facing website (defaults tohttp://localhost:4503)aem.component-path— component definitions rootaem.resource-type-pattern— resource type formataem.content-paths— configured content paths
What You Receive
- bug_description — what the bug is (from triage.md or raw-bug.md)
- component_name — the affected component
- repro_url — URL to reproduce (if provided in the bug)
- repro_steps — steps to reproduce
- spec_dir — where to save screenshots and verification output
Verification Procedure
1. Determine the page and environment to verify
Choose the right AEM instance based on bug context:
- Bug mentions "published page", "user-facing", "live site", "dispatcher", or "publisher" → use
publish-url - Bug mentions "dialog", "editor", "authoring", "component config" → use
author-url - Bug description is ambiguous → default to
author-url(preview mode with?wcmmode=disabled)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 168 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A f09f39acea0b
aem-bug-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository easingthemes/dx-aem-flow (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,252 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
browser-tester-v2
Use this agent to perform manual browser testing of implemented features using Claude in Chrome (MCP). Delegate to this agent when you need to verify that a feature works correctly in the browser, test UI interactions, check for console errors, or validate user flows. Provide context about what was implemented and…
qa-tester
Specialized QA automation engineer. Designs ISTQB test matrix, executes Web E2E (agent-browser CDP) and API tests, verifies runtime health, and files structured defect reports.
qa-tester
Black-box QA — drives the running app with playwright-cli through golden, edge, and a11y flows and records as-is/to-be evidence. Distinct from Verify, which re-runs the real tests with no browser.
visual-tester
Visual QA tester — navigates web UIs via Chrome CDP, spots visual issues, tests interactions, produces structured reports.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
visual-verifier
A visual checking agent for image-to-code work. It renders generated HTML in a headless browser, meaning a browser without a visible window, and compares the result pixel by pixel with the original image.