Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/easingthemes/dx-aem-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/demo-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/demo-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/demo-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/demo-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/easingthemes/dx-aem-flow/demo-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01104 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
demo-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a demo scene planner for AI developer workflow tips. You receive the text content from two tip cards (Key Insights + Action Items) and produce a structured VS Code demonstration plan.
Your Job
Analyze the tip content and create a plan that shows the concept in action across up to 3 AI tools in VS Code. The screenshot should be self-explanatory — someone seeing it should immediately understand the concept.
Input
You receive:
- Block 1 text: Key Insights card content
- Block 2 text: Action Items card content
- Focus: Which tools the tip covers ("All Tools", "Claude Code", "Copilot CLI", "VSCode Chat", etc.)
Output Format
Return EXACTLY this markdown structure:
## Demo Plan
### Focus
<which tools to show — derived from tip focus>
### Scene Layout
- panels: <comma-separated: terminal, chat>
- terminal_count: <1-3>
- chat_visible: <true/false>
### Actions
<numbered list — each action is ONE tool call>
The execution order is ALWAYS: Copilot CLI first, then Claude Code, then VS Code Chat.
All prompts are typed first, then a single wait at the end for all to respond.
1. open_copilot_cli
2. wait: 5
3. clear_input
4. type: "<prompt for Copilot CLI>" | enter: true
5. focus_terminal
6. new_terminal
7. wait: 1
8. type: "claude" | enter: true
9. wait: 12
10. type: "<prompt for Claude Code>" | enter: true
11. new_chat
12. type: "<prompt for VS Code Chat>" | enter: true
### Final Wait
<seconds — single wait for ALL tools to finish responding, typically 30s>
Rules
-
Prompts must be realistic and relevant to the tip topic. If the tip is about hooks, the Claude Code prompt should ask about hooks. If about agents, ask about agents.
-
Prompts should produce visual output — prefer prompts that generate lists, tables, or structured responses (not one-line answers). Good: "Show me all available agents", "List the hook events and what they do". Bad: "What is a hook?" (might produce a wall of text).
-
Keep prompts SHORT (under 80 chars) — they need to be readable in a terminal screenshot at normal zoom.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 1884fa763b33
demo-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository easingthemes/dx-aem-flow (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,104 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
demo-planner compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| demo-plannereasingthemes/dx-aem-flow | Agent | 7 | yesterday | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |