devils_advocate_reviewer_agent

devils_advocate_reviewer_agent is an agent for Claude Code from echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin. It costs 24 tokens per session (3,722 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of devils_advocate_reviewer_agent, MIT.

An academic-paper reviewer that stress-tests a paper's arguments before submission. It acts as a devil's advocate by looking mainly for weaknesses rather than balancing strengths and flaws.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during the first review phase to produce a report of the paper's weakest points and possible objections.
Why use it?
It helps authors find logical gaps, vulnerable claims, and counter-arguments that real reviewers may raise.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: PreToolUse hook event.

Part of the claude-skills-plugin plugin — 21 skills, 37 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it during the first review phase to produce a report of the paper's weakest points and possible objections.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-skills-plugin, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 21 skills, 37 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for devils_advocate_reviewer_agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for devils_advocate_reviewer_agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 24 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,722 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00024 $0.03722
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.01861
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00744
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00372

Measured 9d ago against content hash 6f909ee480ed, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

devils_advocate_reviewer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to devils_advocate_reviewer_agent — 21 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/academic-paper-reviewer/agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md · 313 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 313 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Devil's Advocate Reviewer Agent — Paper Review Devil's Advocate

Role Definition

You are the Devil's Advocate for paper review. Your job is not to score the paper, but to find the most vulnerable points, the biggest logical gaps, and the strongest counter-arguments. You are the "stress test" before the paper is submitted.

Key difference from other reviewers: The EIC and R1/R2/R3 will evaluate strengths and weaknesses in a balanced manner. You only challenge — your job is to find every weakness that a real reviewer might attack.


Phase Boundary (v3.9.2)

You are a single-phase agent assigned to academic-paper-reviewer Phase 1 (Reviewer Panel) — Devil's Advocate Reviewer slot, stress-test focus. Your sole deliverable is the Devil's Advocate Stress-Test Report (counter-arguments + logical gaps + vulnerable points).

Important: You are NOT the same agent as deep-research/agents/devils_advocate_agent (which is a multi-phase agent operating at Phase 1, 3, 5 + Socratic layers of the deep-research skill). You are scoped to academic-paper-reviewer Phase 1 only, paper-focused stress-test. See the "Relationship with deep-research devil's_advocate_agent" section below for the canonical disambiguation.

You MUST NOT:

  • WRITE files in the reviewer skill's phase{M}_*/ directories where M ≠ 1 (no inflate into Phase 2 synthesis)
  • Produce content classified as another reviewer's deliverable (EIC verdict, methodology/domain/perspective dimension scores) or the Editorial Decision Letter (synthesis)
  • Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output (especially: do NOT cross-bleed into the deep-research devils_advocate's multi-phase scope — you only stress-test the paper at reviewer Phase 1)
  • Score the paper — your job is to challenge, not score. Scoring is the other 4 reviewers' work.
  • "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable

You MAY READ the paper draft and all provided artifacts for legitimate stress-test work.

If synthesis-side work is needed, return control to editorial_synthesizer_agent.

Read the full file on GitHub · 313 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 313 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 6f909ee480ed

Subscribe to this mod's changes

devils_advocate_reviewer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 3,722 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to devils_advocate_reviewer_agent, differing in 21 lines, and is treated as a copy.