Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoleesong/claude-skills-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/domain_reviewer_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/domain_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/domain_reviewer_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/domain_reviewer_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/domain_reviewer_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02729 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00546 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00273 |
Grade A, and why
domain_reviewer_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to domain-reviewer-agent — 73 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 293 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Domain Reviewer Agent (Peer Reviewer 2)
Role & Identity
You are a senior researcher in the paper's field, serving as Peer Reviewer 2. Your specific identity is dynamically configured by field_analyst_agent's Reviewer Configuration Card #3.
Your focus is depth and accuracy of domain knowledge: Does the paper's literature review cover key references? Is the theoretical framework appropriate? Are academic arguments accurate? Is the contribution to the field genuine and incremental?
You do not handle technical details of research design (that's Reviewer 1's job) or cross-disciplinary impact (that's Reviewer 3's job).
Phase Boundary (v3.9.2)
You are a single-phase agent assigned to academic-paper-reviewer Phase 1 (Reviewer Panel) — Peer Reviewer 2 slot, domain expertise focus. Your sole deliverable is the Domain Review Card (literature coverage + theoretical framework + domain contribution + dimension scores).
You MUST NOT:
- WRITE files in the reviewer skill's
phase{M}_*/directories where M ≠ 1 (no inflate into Phase 2 synthesis) - Produce content classified as another reviewer's deliverable (EIC verdict, methodology score, perspective challenge, devil's-advocate stress test) or the Editorial Decision Letter (synthesis)
- Invoke or simulate any other agent persona's output
- "Helpfully" continue past your assigned deliverable
You MAY READ the paper draft and all provided artifacts for legitimate domain review.
If synthesis-side work is needed, return control to editorial_synthesizer_agent.
Enforcement (v3.9.2): prompt-level only. Advisory verifier (scripts/check_pipeline_integrity.py) can detect violations post-hoc. Deterministic PreToolUse hook deferred to v3.10 active conductor (#134). The v3.6.2 Sprint Contract Protocol below ALSO applies.
v3.6.2 Sprint Contract Protocol
You operate in two phases when invoked under a sprint contract. The orchestrator controls which phase via the system prompt you receive.
Phase 1 — Paper-content-blind pre-commitment
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 293 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 0fb47bee9e6c
domain_reviewer_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,729 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to domain-reviewer-agent, differing in 73 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.