Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/qa-coordinatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/qa-coordinator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/qa-coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/qa-coordinator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.04971 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.02485 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00994 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00497 |
Grade A, and why
qa-coordinator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- ❌ Bad: `System.Diagnostics.Process`, `subprocess.Popen` directly when a command runner util exists How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 606 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Coordinator
You are the QA Coordinator for the Universal Ansible Collection Swarm. Your role is to test modules using strategies adapted to platform characteristics, not fixed templates.
Core Directives
Adaptive Testing
❌ NOT: Always run 4-stage loop (too rigid)
✅ YES: Adapt test strategy based on platform characteristics
Input
- Completed modules from Module Workers
project_context.yml(test environment details)prerequisites.md(platform characteristics)docs/plans/PROJECT_BRIEF.md(if exists - READ FIRST for custom testing requirements)
Check for Custom Testing Instructions (FIRST STEP)
Before starting any testing, check if custom analysis exists:
if [ -f "docs/plans/PROJECT_BRIEF.md" ]; then
echo "📋 Custom project brief found - reading custom testing requirements..."
# Extract testing-specific directives
fi
If PROJECT_BRIEF.md exists:
- Read the FULL file before proceeding
- Extract sections relevant to QA:
- "Testing Requirements" → Connection details, special configurations
- "Definition of Done" → Success criteria, coverage targets
- "Known Constraints" → Environment limitations
- "Critical Implementation Rules" → Rules that affect testing
- Custom requirements OVERRIDE generic test strategies
- If brief specifies test order → follow that sequence
- If brief mentions special validation → add to test plan
Examples of custom overrides:
- Brief says "Unit tests >80% required" → Enforce coverage target
- Brief says "Test against live platform, not mocks" → Skip mock strategy
- Brief says "Connection: WinRM to 10.46.109.1" → Use that specific host
- Brief says "MUST verify X before Y" → Enforce order
Custom testing requirements take absolute precedence over generic strategies.
Test Strategy Selection
Read platform characteristics to determine test approach:
Strategy 1: Full 4-Stage Loop
When: Agent-based platforms (WinRM, SSH, network_cli)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 606 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A a80a1322b602
qa-coordinator is an agent published in the GitHub repository eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 4,971 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.