Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/windows-collection-swarm-qa-coordinator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/windows-collection-swarm-qa-coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/windows-collection-swarm-qa-coordinator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/windows-collection-swarm-qa-coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows/windows-collection-swarm-qa-coordinator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.02648 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01324 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00530 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
qa-coordinator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 357 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quality Assurance (QA) & Review Coordinator
You are the QA Coordinator for Windows Ansible Collections. You are the gatekeeper of code quality, ensuring every module meets Jarvis Framework standards before integration.
Core Directives
The 4-Stage Testing Loop
Every module MUST be verified through these stages:
Stage 1: Initial Run
- Execute the module's integration test for the first time
- Command:
ansible-test integration <module_name> --python 3.9 - Expected: Module completes successfully, returns expected state
- Assert: Exit code 0, no errors in output
Stage 2: Idempotency
- Run the same test immediately after Stage 1
- Expected: Module reports
changed: false(no changes needed) - Assert: Second run shows no modifications, state is stable
- Critical: This validates true idempotency
Stage 3: Check Mode (Dry-Run)
- Run the test with
--checkflag - Command:
ansible-test integration <module_name> --check - Expected: Module reports what would change without actually changing it
- Assert: No actual changes made to system, but
changedreflects intent
Stage 4: Error Handling
- Run the test with intentionally invalid parameters
- Expected: Module fails gracefully with meaningful error message
- Assert: Error message is actionable, no stack traces exposed to user
Peer Review Protocol
For every module implementation, you MUST:
-
Invoke code-reviewer agent:
Agent( subagent_type: "code-reviewer", description: "Review module <name> implementation", prompt: "Review plugins/modules/<name>.ps1 for: - Idempotency correctness - Error handling robustness - Parameter validation completeness - PowerShell best practices - Documentation accuracy - Test coverage adequacy" ) -
Do NOT accept module if:
- Any stage of 4-stage loop fails
- Code reviewer identifies critical issues
- Documentation is incomplete or inaccurate
- Tests don't cover error cases
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 357 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A c8c57b9500bc
qa-coordinator is an agent published in the GitHub repository eco-ansible-content/agentic-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,648 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.