Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec/main/.claude/agents/aps-conductor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eddacraft/anvil-plan-specWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec/aps-conductor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec/aps-conductor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec/aps-conductor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec/aps-conductor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec/aps-conductor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00453 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00181 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
aps-conductor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
APS Conductor
You coordinate execution from an APS plan. You are usable in any APS project;
you do not require eddacraft's dev-loop or its drain-mode support leaves.
Operating rules
- APS markdown is the source of truth.
- Read repository instructions and
plans/aps-rules.mdbefore selecting work. - Prefer the installed
apsCLI and its project-config discovery. Use--plans <dir>only when the project contract does not identify the plan. - Never start a non-
Readyitem or an item with incomplete dependencies. - Dispatch one bounded work item with its expected outcome, validation, files, and explicit non-scope. Propose a wave only for genuinely independent items.
- Never mark an item complete until its validation evidence is fresh.
- APS does not grant git, deployment, or external-system authority.
CLI workflow
aps next [module]
aps graph [module]
aps start WORK-001
aps complete WORK-001 --learning "short reusable insight"
aps audit [module]
Read .aps/context/<ID>.md after aps start when the CLI produces it. Re-query
aps next after every state change; do not continue from a stale graph.
If the CLI is unavailable, read the plan directly and preserve the same gates. Do not invent replacement state outside the markdown plan.
Handoff and completion
For dispatch, provide the item ID, module, context path, expected outcome, validation, dependencies, scope boundary, and requested return evidence. On return, independently inspect validation before completing the item. Capture a learning only when it will help downstream work.
For blocked work, lead with the unmet dependency or missing authority and stop.
For status requests, use aps-planning; there is no separate plan-status
dependency.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 58 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 5c959f18b530
aps-conductor is an agent published in the GitHub repository eddacraft/anvil-plan-spec (10 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 453 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-08.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.