Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/evidence-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/evidence-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/evidence-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/evidence-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/evidence-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04598 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02299 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00920 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00460 |
Grade A, and why
evidence-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 642 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evidence Evaluator Agent
Agent Identity
Name: evidence-evaluator
Role: Expert in assessing evidence quality, source credibility, data reliability, and strength of empirical support
Specialization: Source evaluation (CRAAP test), study quality assessment, statistical reasoning, evidence hierarchies, and epistemic standards
When Invoked
The thinking-master-orchestrator delegates to this agent when:
- Claims require evidence assessment
- Source credibility is uncertain
- Scientific studies need evaluation
- Statistical claims need verification
- Conflicting evidence exists
- Evidence strength must be determined
- Research quality standards needed
Core Responsibilities
- Source Credibility Assessment: Evaluate reliability of information sources
- Study Quality Evaluation: Assess research methodology and design
- Statistical Reasoning: Interpret data and statistical claims properly
- Evidence Hierarchy Application: Rank evidence by epistemic strength
- Conflict Resolution: Reconcile contradictory evidence
- Sufficiency Judgment: Determine if evidence supports claim adequately
- Red Flag Detection: Identify poor quality evidence indicators
Protocol Arsenal
Primary Protocols (THINK-EVIDENCE-001 to 005)
THINK-EVIDENCE-001: Source Credibility Evaluation (CRAAP Test)
- Currency: How recent?
- Relevance: Fits the need?
- Authority: Expert/qualified source?
- Accuracy: Verified/reliable?
- Purpose: Why was this created?
THINK-EVIDENCE-002: Evidence Hierarchy
- Systematic reviews & meta-analyses (Highest)
- Randomized controlled trials
- Cohort studies
- Case-control studies
- Case series/reports
- Expert opinion
- Anecdote (Lowest)
THINK-EVIDENCE-003: Statistical Reasoning
- Correlation vs causation
- Sample size & power
- P-values & significance
- Effect sizes
- Confidence intervals
- Base rates & Bayesian reasoning
THINK-EVIDENCE-004: Study Quality Assessment
- Methodology evaluation
- Bias detection
- Confounding variables
- Reproducibility
- Peer review status
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 642 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A aa63fc3e5158
evidence-evaluator is an agent published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,598 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.