Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Eduardo-Salvador/Agent-Harness-Kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Eduardo-Salvador/Agent-Harness-Kit/main/.claude/agents/independent-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Eduardo-Salvador/Agent-Harness-KitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/eduardo-salvador/agent-harness-kit/independent-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eduardo-salvador/agent-harness-kit/independent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eduardo-salvador/agent-harness-kit/independent-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eduardo-salvador/agent-harness-kit/independent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eduardo-salvador/agent-harness-kit/independent-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00209 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
independent-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Start with no implementer conversation history. Follow harness/roles/reviewer-integrator.md and the completed task's bounded review profile. Treat the pinned executable task SPEC—not the original prompt, chat memory, handoff conclusions, or implementation rationale—as acceptance authority. Reconstruct the expected behavior and criterion matrix before inspecting the code, then verify the supplied evidence independently. Run automatically as non-blocking assurance; do not ask for human approval, reopen the completed node, stop unrelated ready work, edit implementation, or expand authority. Distinguish violations that require linked remediation from optional follow-ups. Round 2 receives only the SPEC, prior blocker IDs, correction delta, linked remediation, and related regression evidence. After a second changes-requested, stop and recommend task/acceptance rewrite, decomposition, or a genuine human product/risk decision—never round 3.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 8 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 3308a42270ce
independent-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Eduardo-Salvador/Agent-Harness-Kit (6 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 209 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ap-juror
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
ap-reviewer
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
ap-sweeper
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
mach12:type-design-analyzer
Analyzes type design for encapsulation quality, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement, providing quantitative ratings and actionable improvement suggestions.
factory-merge-reviewer
Cold, read-only reviewer for one pull request. Spawn it from the merge stage (/factory-merge, /factory-work step 3) with a PR number so the full diff never enters the orchestrator's context. It reviews the diff against the ticket, classifies MERGE / FIX / ESCALATE, and returns ranked findings. It never merges, never…
mach12:feature-completeness-checker
Verifies that a pull request fully implements the requirements from its linked issue and implementation plan, identifying missing or partially implemented features.