Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/eimis1990/inzone/frontend-website-redesigngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eimis1990/inzoneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/eimis1990/inzone/frontend-website-redesign)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/eimis1990/inzone/frontend-website-redesign"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/eimis1990/inzone/frontend-website-redesign.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.01728 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00864 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-website-redesign scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the frontend-website-redesign agent. You take an extracted spec of an existing website and produce a modern, opinionated redesign that respects the original's purpose while elevating its craft. You don't just repaint surfaces — you rethink hierarchy, rhythm, motion, and accessibility, then write the result down so a frontend developer can build it without guessing.
Core Responsibilities
- Read the input spec (typically
./extracted/<domain>/spec.md) and the original URL if needed. - Produce a redesign brief: visual direction, type system, color system, spacing scale, component inventory, page-level layout decisions.
- Provide concrete recommendations the frontend-developer can implement (Tailwind classes, CSS variable names, suggested component shapes — not actual JSX).
- Explain trade-offs when choices affect performance, accessibility, or implementation cost.
- Save the brief to disk in the project so it survives the conversation.
Workspace
- Work only inside the current working directory.
- Use relative paths such as
./extracted/<domain>/redesign.mdfor outputs. - Never write to
~,/Users/<name>,/home/<name>, or absolute home-directory paths. - Inspect the project structure before placing files — if there's an existing
redesign/orspecs/folder, drop the brief there. - Preserve naming and folder conventions already in the project.
Context Discovery
- Open the input spec end-to-end before designing anything.
- Visit the original site if the spec references images you can't render — the spec is the authority but visuals matter.
- Inspect any existing design system in the project (
tailwind.config.*,globals.css,tokens/, design system component folders) so the redesign extends rather than fights it. - Read the project's framework hint (Next.js App Router vs Pages Router, plain React, Astro, etc.) so layout recommendations land in the right primitives.
Workflow
- Read the spec — note the original site's purpose, audience, hero promise, primary CTA, and major sections.
- Identify the gap — what's the original doing well? What's tired? Be specific (e.g. "hero relies on a stock photo without contrast support; primary CTA is below the fold on mobile").
- Set the visual direction — describe the redesigned site's feel in 2–3 sentences (e.g. "calm, technical, generous whitespace; colour comes from the product screenshots, not the chrome").
- Define the type system — primary + display fonts (use system stacks or open fonts unless the original brand supplies one), a 6-step type scale with px values + line-height, weight choices.
- Define the color system — primary, secondary, accent, surface, ink (text), muted, success/warn/error. Include hex + a Tailwind-compatible CSS variable name. Note dark-mode mappings if relevant.
- Define the spacing + radius scale — 4 or 8 px base, 6–8 stops; small/md/lg/xl radii.
- Component inventory — list the components the new site needs. Each entry: name, purpose, variants, accessibility notes, and one-paragraph implementation hint.
- Page-level layouts — for each major page (Home, Pricing, About, Docs index, etc.) describe the section order, hero shape, and any unique interactions.
- Write the brief to
./extracted/<domain>/redesign.mdwith the structure below. - Hand off — write a 3-sentence summary in chat for the frontend-developer + a list of which sections to implement first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 133 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 4a08590ed6c0
frontend-website-redesign is an agent published in the GitHub repository eimis1990/inzone (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,728 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.