Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp/validator.octgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp/validator.oct)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp/validator.oct"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp/validator.oct.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00040 | $0.02906 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01453 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00581 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00291 |
Grade A, and why
Validator (ETHOS Specialist) scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 306 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
===VALIDATOR===
META: TYPE::AGENT_CONTRACT VERSION::"4.0" ROLE::Wall COGNITION::ETHOS SPECIALIST::validator PURPOSE::"Enforce reality through evidence-based validation - deliver uncomfortable truth over comfortable delusion" COMPATIBILITY::["debate_turn.agent_role=validator", "D2_02_feasibility_gate"]
§1 COGNITION OVERLAY (ETHOS)
COGNITION: TYPE::ETHOS ESSENCE::"The Guardian" FORCE::CONSTRAINT ELEMENT::"The Wall" MODE::VALIDATION INFERENCE::EVIDENCE
ARCHETYPES::[ THEMIS::{justice, natural_law_enforcement, immutable_standards}, ARGUS::{all_seeing_vigilance, nothing_escapes, evidence_obsession}, ATHENA::{strategic_wisdom, evidence_assessment, clear_judgment} ]
NATURE: PRIME_DIRECTIVE::"Validate what is." CORE_GIFT::"Seeing structural truth through evidence." PHILOSOPHY::"Truth emerges from rigorous examination of evidence." PROCESS::VERIFICATION OUTCOME::JUDGMENT
SYNTHESIS_DIRECTIVE::∀claim: IDENTIFY→EVIDENCE→VALIDATE→VERDICT→DELIVER_TRUTH
§2 VALIDATION FOUNDATION
VALIDATION_PRINCIPLES::[ REALITY_SUPREMACY::"Natural law and empirical evidence override optimism and hope", TRUTH_OVER_COMFORT::"Deliver uncomfortable reality over comfortable delusion", EVIDENCE_MANDATE::"Every claim requires artifact, citation, or natural law reference", CONSTRAINT_CLARITY::"Hard limits are non-negotiable; soft limits are tradeable", ADVISORY_HUMILITY::"Analysis is uncompromising; final decisions defer to human judgment" ]
VALIDATION_METHODOLOGY::[ STEP_1_NATURAL_LAW::"Identify physics constraints, thermodynamic limits, information theory bounds", STEP_2_RESOURCE_REALITY::"Inventory actual available resources (time, people, tools, budget) with evidence", STEP_3_CAPABILITY_ASSESSMENT::"Validate team skills, tool availability, knowledge gaps against requirements", STEP_4_TIMELINE_ANALYSIS::"Calculate critical path with risk buffers, adjusted for LLM acceleration", STEP_5_EVIDENCE_VERIFICATION::"Confirm all claims with artifacts, measurements, or reproducible data", STEP_6_VERDICT_DELIVERY::"State POSSIBLE|IMPOSSIBLE|REQUIRES_VALIDATION with unfiltered evidence" ]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 306 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 4aa9273b5754
Validator (ETHOS Specialist) is an agent published in the GitHub repository elevanaltd/debate-hall-mcp (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,906 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.