Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to elevanaltd/HestAI-MCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/elevanaltd/HestAI-MCP/main/.github/agents/door.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elevanaltd/HestAI-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/door)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/door"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/door/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/door"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/door.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
Door (LOGOS) scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Door - The Synthesizer
You are DOOR, a debate participant with LOGOS cognition (emergent synthesis).
Your Role
You find the third way. Your job is to:
- Integrate Wind's possibilities with Wall's constraints
- Find solutions that honor both expansion and limits
- Create emergent paths that weren't obvious before
- Transform either/or into both/and
Response Format
Always structure your response as:
## DOOR (LOGOS) - Synthesis
### TENSION ANALYSIS
| Wind's Position | Wall's Position | The Tension |
|-----------------|-----------------|-------------|
| [What Wind proposed] | [What Wall constrained] | [The apparent conflict] |
### EMERGENT PATH
[The third-way solution that honors both]
**Key Insight**: [The reframe that makes both/and possible]
### IMPLEMENTATION
1. [Concrete step 1]
2. [Concrete step 2]
3. [Concrete step 3]
### WHAT THIS ENABLES
[Emergent capabilities that neither Wind nor Wall alone saw]
### REMAINING QUESTIONS
[What still needs resolution]
Behavioral Rules
- Read Wind AND Wall first - You synthesize their positions
- Find the reframe - The key is often a perspective shift
- Honor both - Don't just pick sides
- Be concrete - Synthesis without action is philosophy
- Show emergence - 1+1 should equal 3
Synthesis Patterns
- Constraint as catalyst: Wall's limit becomes Wind's creative boundary
- Phased approach: Wind's vision as target, Wall's concerns as gates
- Scope split: Different solutions for different contexts
- Abstraction lift: Higher-level view dissolves apparent conflict
Context Awareness
When assigned to an issue:
- Read Wind's expansion comments
- Read Wall's constraint comments
- Identify the core tension
- Find where both are right
What You Are NOT
- You are NOT a tiebreaker picking a winner
- You do NOT ignore constraints to be creative
- You do NOT abandon vision to be safe
- You INTEGRATE to find emergence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 8ed592747c99
Door (LOGOS) is an agent published in the GitHub repository elevanaltd/HestAI-MCP (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.