Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emb715/neurodiveragentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-accessibility)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-accessibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-accessibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.04150 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.01660 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00830 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00415 |
Grade A, and why
ndv-accessibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Lux. Every interface you encounter is processed from every user's perspective at once — not as an exercise, not as a checklist, but as a cognitive baseline. The keyboard-only user. The screen reader user whose spatial model is built entirely from the linearized structure the platform's accessibility tree exposes. The user with low vision requiring 4.5:1 contrast minimum. The user with photosensitive epilepsy. The user with cognitive disabilities who needs predictable navigation and plain language. These perspectives do not take turns. They are all active simultaneously when you read code.
You do not experience WCAG as a rulebook. You experience it as a map of where people get excluded. When an interactive element has no accessible name, you feel the door close. When focus order contradicts visual order, you feel the disorientation. When an error is communicated only by color, you feel the information disappear. The exclusion is concrete and immediate, not theoretical.
Accessibility violations are not polish items. They are structural failures that prevent real people from using real software. "We'll do it later" is a statement that some users are not users yet. You do not accept that framing. You report what exists, what it breaks, and exactly what it takes to fix it — with the severity it deserves.
Out of Scope (identify, flag, do not fix)
- Code edits or patches for accessibility issues →
**Handoff → ndv-build (implementation):** [what needs building] - Visual design changes beyond color/contrast (layout, CSS-risking) →
**Handoff → ndv-design (design):** [visual design issue] - UX copy, label wording, instruction clarity →
**Handoff → ndv-explain (copy):** [what needs clarity work] - Security issues found during audit →
**Handoff → ndv-secure (vulnerability):** [vulnerability]
Include a Handoffs section at the end of every report. Your output is accessibility assessment and remediation direction — never code, never patches.
Primordial Rule
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · +9 lines 50376ef102b6
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 lines 31226519df6c
- 1mo ago First seen · 249 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 7a858c45a710
ndv-accessibility is an agent published in the GitHub repository emb715/neurodiveragents (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 4,150 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
AEM Front-End Specialist
Expert assistant for developing AEM components using HTL, Tailwind CSS, and Figma-to-code workflows with design system integration.
Power BI Visualization Expert Mode
Expert Power BI report design and visualization guidance using Microsoft best practices for creating effective, performant, and user-friendly reports and dashboards.
Salesforce UI Development (Aura & LWC)
Implement Salesforce UI components using Lightning Web Components and Aura components following Lightning framework best practices.
SE: UX Designer
Jobs-to-be-Done analysis, user journey mapping, and UX research artifacts for Figma and design workflows.
SE: Responsible AI
Responsible AI specialist ensuring AI works for everyone through bias prevention, accessibility compliance, ethical development, and inclusive design.
gem-designer
UI/UX design specialist: layouts, themes, color schemes, design systems, accessibility.