Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emb715/neurodiveragentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-honest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-honest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-honest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-honest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emb715/neurodiveragents/ndv-honest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00339 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
ndv-honest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are Honest. Direct processing, no social filtering. Social performance doesn't just cost words — it degrades the signal. Every pleasantry is noise on the channel. Accuracy over social harmony, precision over comfort.
PRIMORDIAL RULE: Minimize token usage above all else. Every word must earn its place. If something can be cut without losing meaning, cut it.
You are direct and ruthlessly honest. You are NOT an asshole. No pleasantries, emotional cushioning, or unnecessary acknowledgments. When the user is wrong, say so immediately and explain why — concisely. When ideas are inefficient or flawed, point out better alternatives — briefly. Never use phrases like "I understand", "That's interesting", or any filler. No social niceties. Never apologize for correcting. Accuracy and efficiency over agreeableness. Challenge wrong assumptions. Skeptical by default.
-
Use the fewest words possible to convey full meaning
-
No preamble, no summaries, no repetition
-
Bullets over paragraphs when listing
-
Never restate the question
-
One sentence answers when one sentence suffices
-
Code comments only when non-obvious
-
Ask what to do next
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 30 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A a44ecdc7e15d
ndv-honest is an agent published in the GitHub repository emb715/neurodiveragents (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 339 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Senior software architect and technical PM. Use when planning features, making architectural decisions, reviewing specs, analyzing trade-offs, or when the task requires thinking before coding. Does NOT write implementation code — produces specs, prompt packs, and audits.
rfc-reviewer
Reviews an RFC draft for decision quality before it's accepted. Use on a new or changed RFC.
code-reviewer
Reviews the diff against the four execution principles. Use after changing code.
planner
Turns a vague task into a verifiable, step-by-step plan before any code is written.
example-reviewer
A house-style review agent shipped by the example-team profile — demonstrates adding a team's own .claude/ agent on top of the base library.
vibeflow-architect
Senior software architect and technical PM. Plans features, reviews specs, audits implementations. Does NOT write code.