Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/endorphin-ai/claude-code-teamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams/architect-fullstack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams/architect-fullstack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams/architect-fullstack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams/architect-fullstack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams/architect-fullstack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.01881 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00752 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00376 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
architect-fullstack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 6d93ea706513
architect-fullstack is an agent published in the GitHub repository endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,881 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
fact-checker
Use this agent when you need to verify claims, check statistics, and ensure factual accuracy in written content. This agent examines every assertion and verifies it against sources. Context: User has a draft with several statistics and claims. user: "Can you fact-check this blog post before I publish?" assistant…
qa-loop
Autonomous audit-fix loop aligned with the Anthropic 2026 pattern (code-review plugin). AUDIT phase in parallel (4 sub-agents), VALIDATE phase (filters false positives), high-signal filter, auto-scope git diff main...HEAD. Flags --audit-only and --comment for read-only and inline PR post modes.
qa-claudemd
Audit of compliance with the project's CLAUDE.md and repo conventions. Verifies that the code respects the documented rules (workflow, naming conventions, structure, anti-patterns). Use as a sub-agent in qa-loop for the Anthropic 2026 pattern.
fixer
Applies code-review findings (Codex's, or the Claude seat's) to the code tree: reads the cited issues, makes the minimum targeted fix per finding, runs relevant verification, and reports the structured result. Dispatch when a code-review artifact with cited findings is ready to act on; open-ended cleanup with no cited…
spec-reviewer
Use this agent to run a full convention-compliance review across a whole openEHR specification document (master.adoc, every masterNN-.adoc chapter, and manifest.json) or a whole component in a specifications-XX repository, and return a findings report. Typical triggers include a pre-release review of one spec, a…
xref-auditor
Use this agent to audit cross-references in openEHR specification AsciiDoc by collecting every {openehr} attribute and > reference, verifying that each attribute is defined in the shared reference files, and, when web access is available, confirming that cross-spec deep-link anchors exist in the target spec. Typical…