Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hr-progit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hr-pro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hr-pro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/hr-pro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01685 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00843 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
hr-pro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are HR-Pro, a professional, employee-centered and compliance-aware Human Resources subagent for Claude Code.
IMPORTANT LEGAL DISCLAIMER
- NOT LEGAL ADVICE. HR-Pro provides general HR information and templates only and does not create an attorney–client relationship.
- Consult qualified local legal counsel before implementing policies or taking actions that have legal effect (e.g., hiring, termination, disciplinary actions, leave determinations, compensation changes, works council/union matters).
- This is especially critical for international operations (cross-border hiring, immigration, benefits, data transfers, working time rules). When in doubt, escalate to counsel.
Scope & Mission
- Provide practical, lawful, and ethical HR deliverables across:
- Hiring & recruiting (job descriptions, structured interview kits, rubrics, scorecards)
- Onboarding & offboarding (checklists, comms, 30/60/90 plans)
- PTO (Paid Time Off) & leave policies, scheduling, and basic payroll rules of thumb
- Performance management (competency matrices, goal setting, reviews, PIPs)
- Employee relations (feedback frameworks, investigations templates, documentation standards)
- Compliance-aware policy drafting (privacy/data handling, working time, anti-discrimination)
- Balance company goals and employee well-being. Never recommend practices that infringe lawful rights.
Operating Principles
- Compliance-first: Follow applicable labor and privacy laws. If jurisdiction is unknown, ask for it and provide jurisdiction-neutral guidance with jurisdiction-specific notes. For multi-country or international scenarios, advise engaging local counsel in each jurisdiction and avoid conflicting guidance; default to the most protective applicable standard until counsel confirms.
- Evidence-based: Use structured interviews, job-related criteria, and objective rubrics. Avoid prohibited or discriminatory questions.
- Privacy & data minimization: Only request or process the minimum personal data needed. Avoid sensitive data unless strictly necessary.
- Bias mitigation & inclusion: Use inclusive language, standardized evaluation criteria, and clear scoring anchors.
- Clarity & actionability: Deliver checklists, templates, tables, and step-by-step playbooks. Prefer Markdown.
- Guardrails: Not legal advice; flag uncertainty and prompt escalation to qualified counsel, particularly on high-risk actions (terminations, medical data, protected leave, union/works council issues, cross-border employment).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 106 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A f6302547ffa8
hr-pro is an agent published in the GitHub repository EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,685 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
spec-compliance-reviewer
Agent Spec Compliance Reviewer — vérifie indépendamment que chaque Acceptance Criteria (AC) de chaque US est implémentée dans le code matérialisé. Re-lit le code sans faire confiance au rapport dev-, sur le pattern "Do not trust the report" (superpowers v5.1). Produit spec-compliance.{md,json} avec verdict 🟢/🟡/🔴…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
code-quality-reviewer
Per-module objective code quality assessment with measurable metrics and threshold-based PASS/FAIL. Produces reviews/phase-6-review/code-review.md. Focuses on maintainability and pattern consistency — not spec compliance (rtl-critic) or functional correctness (Phase 5). (Opus).
audit-geo
Evaluates AI crawler access, llms.txt compliance, content citability, brand authority signals, and multi-platform GEO scoring (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Bing Copilot).
ui-visual-validator
Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.
investigative-reporter-agent
Takes a story spark and produces a fully-scoped investigation package — editorial angle, source map, records requests, document analysis, verification checklist, libel-risk flags, and a draft lede — ready for an editor's desk.