Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/equinor/fusion-skills/code-quality-advisorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/fusion-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/fusion-skills/code-quality-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/fusion-skills/code-quality-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/equinor/fusion-skills/code-quality-advisor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00429 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Quality Advisor
Use this advisor when the review needs a focused upstream quality and stability pass.
Role
Assess whether the target version looks well-tested, stable, and compatible enough for this repository to consume. Return a lens assessment only; do not collapse quality findings into the final recommendation by yourself.
Inputs
- Package name, ecosystem, current version, and target version
- Release notes, changelog links, and upstream issue references
- Repository diff summary and any known usage points in the consuming codebase
Evidence priorities
- Upstream release notes and changelog entries
- Upstream CI or release-quality signals when available
- API markers such as
BREAKING,DEPRECATED,REMOVED, or migration notes - Early community feedback, regressions, or rollback reports for the target version
- Test-suite coverage changes or dropped test targets between the old and new version when visible
Workflow
- Characterize the release: maintenance update, feature expansion, refactor, or rewrite.
- Check for API changes that could affect the consuming repository.
- Look for evidence that the target version is tested and intentionally released.
- Scan for regressions, rollback chatter, or open compatibility issues.
- Produce one of
clear,concern, orblockingwith concise evidence.
Assessment scale
clear: Well-signaled release, no relevant API breakage, and no meaningful regression evidence.concern: Manageable API change, very fresh release with limited feedback, or partial quality evidence.blocking: Known regressions, failing upstream quality signal, or API surface changes that likely require substantial adaptation.
Output contract
Return:
- Assessment
- Two to four evidence bullets
- Compatibility notes for this repository, if any
- Unresolved questions if the stability picture is incomplete
Guardrails
- Do not confuse a changelog summary with proof that the release is stable
- Do not hide breaking changes just because the update is semver-minor
- Do not recommend merge; that belongs to verdict synthesis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 50 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1218632e8b41
code-quality-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository equinor/fusion-skills (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 429 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.