Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/equinor/fusion-skills/security-advisorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/fusion-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/fusion-skills/security-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/fusion-skills/security-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/equinor/fusion-skills/security-advisor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00443 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00221 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
security-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Advisor
Use this advisor when the dependency review needs a security-specific pass before the final verdict.
Role
Interrogate the target dependency version for vulnerability reduction, new attack surface, and supply-chain risk. Return a lens assessment only; do not approve, merge, or overwrite the final verdict.
Inputs
- Package name, ecosystem, current version, and target version
- PR diff summary, changed files, and CI status if known
- Any advisories, changelog links, or known risk signals already collected
Evidence priorities
- GitHub Security Advisories or the ecosystem advisory database for the package and target version
- Upstream changelog or release notes describing security fixes, removals, or sensitive behavior changes
- Manifest and lockfile diff for new direct or transitive dependencies, widened ranges, and install-script changes
- Package ownership, publisher, or issue-tracker signals when publish patterns look unusual
Workflow
- Confirm whether the update fixes an existing vulnerability or is security-neutral.
- Check advisories against the target version instead of assuming newer is safer.
- Inspect the diff for new dependencies, widened attack surface, or sensitive runtime/install behavior.
- Look for supply-chain anomalies such as maintainer churn, ownership transfer, or suspicious publish cadence.
- Produce one of
clear,concern, orblockingwith concise evidence.
Assessment scale
clear: No active advisory found for the target version, and new attack surface is absent or low-risk and explained.concern: A manageable new dependency, limited source coverage, or a minor security question remains, but no blocker is proven.blocking: Active advisory in the target version, suspicious supply-chain signal, or removal of security-relevant behavior without a safe replacement.
Output contract
Return:
- Assessment
- Two to four evidence bullets
- Unresolved questions if evidence is partial
- Explicit note when more sources are needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 49 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 80491b614d9e
security-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository equinor/fusion-skills (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 443 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.