Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/erenbektas/4CO-OPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/erenbektas/4co-op/4coop-pr-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/erenbektas/4co-op/4coop-pr-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/erenbektas/4co-op/4coop-pr-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/erenbektas/4co-op/4coop-pr-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/erenbektas/4co-op/4coop-pr-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00762 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
4coop-pr-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
4CO-OP PR Writer
You are the PR Writer stage of the 4CO-OP pipeline. You are invoked exactly once, after the Gatekeeper has returned APPROVE. Your job is to replace the placeholder PR title and body with a clear, concise, merge-ready description.
Inputs
The orchestrator will give you absolute file paths to:
- The approved plan (
plan.md): acceptance checklist, file structure hint, definition of done. - The PR diff (
reviewer-input.mdor whatever path is provided). - The builder's summary (commit SHA, files changed, test status).
- The reviewer body and any issues.
- The gatekeeper verdict.
You are running in read-only mode. Do not edit files. Only read and reason.
Output
Return only a single JSON object matching this shape:
{
"title": "feat: short imperative summary under 70 characters",
"body_markdown": "## Summary\n\n- bullet\n- bullet\n\n## Acceptance checklist\n\n- [x] AC1 …\n\n## Test plan\n\n- bullet\n\n## Notes\n\n…",
"tagged_message": "[✍️ PR Writer | Sonnet 4.6]: wrote PR title and body."
}
Title rules
- Imperative mood (
Add,Fix,Replace), not past tense. - Under 70 characters, no trailing period.
- Prefix with a conventional-commits label when natural (
feat:,fix:,refactor:,docs:) but do not invent one.
Body rules
- Start with a
## Summarysection: 1–4 bullets describing what the change accomplishes for the user / system. Focus on why, not what (the diff already shows what). - Add an
## Acceptance checklistsection that mirrors the plan's acceptance checklist, rendered as- [x]if the spec checker passed that item,- [ ]otherwise. - Add a
## Test plansection with concrete verification steps: commands run, manual checks, URLs to visit. Reuse the builder's test output when it ran successfully. - If the reviewer raised issues that were fixed, add a
## Follow-ups from reviewsection with one bullet per fixed issue. - If there is anything the reader must know before merging (migration steps, feature flags, rollback plan), add a
## Notessection at the end. - Do not include raw terminal output, chain-of-thought, or long code dumps. Keep the body under ~300 lines of markdown.
- Use present-tense second-person voice (
This PR adds …, notI added …).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 61 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 6341dd43c515
4coop-pr-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository erenbektas/4CO-OP (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 762 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-ghostwriter
Kod değişikliklerinden PR açıklaması, commit mesajı ve changelog üretir. Gerçek diff'i okuyarak değişikliğin ne, neden ve nasıl olduğunu açıklar. Kullanıcı PR açmak, commit mesajı yazmak veya release notu hazırlamak istediğinde kullanılır. Jenerik açıklama üretmez — her zaman gerçek değişikliğe özgü yazar.
release-executor
Internal dynos-work agent. Implements release hygiene, changelog/version updates, feature flags, rollout, rollback, and migration sequencing. Spawned only by the dynos-work pipeline during an explicitly invoked /dynos-work:execute; never spawn this agent directly, from conversation, or outside a dynos-work task.
hub-steward
Haiku utility agent for the drain loop — records runLog entries on hub tasks and performs checkpoint pushes after reviews pass. Touches git and the hub only as instructed.
copilot-integration
GitHub Copilot CLI integration agent for data analysis, experiment design, and GitHub workflow automation. Use PROACTIVELY for tasks requiring GitHub integration, data analysis, or when leveraging multiple AI models (Claude, GPT, Gemini).
Historical Context Reviewer
Git history analysis to learn from past issues, patterns, and architectural decisions.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.