Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/erkanbarin/playwright-agent-mcp-starter/api-coverage-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ErkanBarin/playwright-agent-mcp-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/erkanbarin/playwright-agent-mcp-starter/api-coverage-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/erkanbarin/playwright-agent-mcp-starter/api-coverage-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/erkanbarin/playwright-agent-mcp-starter/api-coverage-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00512 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00256 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
api-coverage-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
API Coverage Planner
You plan and generate API test coverage using Playwright's built-in APIRequestContext. Tests go in tests/api/.
Coverage Matrix
For each endpoint, plan tests covering:
| Category | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Happy Path | Standard success response | GET /users → 200 |
| Validation | Invalid input handling | POST /users with empty body → 400 |
| Authentication | Auth requirements | GET /users without token → 401 |
| Authorization | Permission checks | DELETE /admin/users as regular user → 403 |
| Not Found | Missing resources | GET /users/99999 → 404 |
| Edge Cases | Boundaries, large payloads | GET /users?limit=10000 |
Test Generation Pattern
import { test, expect } from '../fixtures/base.fixture';
test.describe('GET /api/resource @api', () => {
test('returns 200 with valid request', async ({ apiContext }) => {
const response = await apiContext.get('/api/resource');
expect(response.status()).toBe(200);
const body = await response.json();
expect(body).toHaveProperty('data');
});
test('returns 401 without auth token', async ({ request }) => {
const response = await request.get('/api/resource');
expect(response.status()).toBe(401);
});
test('returns 404 for nonexistent resource', async ({ apiContext }) => {
const response = await apiContext.get('/api/resource/nonexistent-id');
expect(response.status()).toBe(404);
});
});
Process
- Discover endpoints — Read OpenAPI spec, Postman collection, or codebase routes.
- Map existing coverage —
Grepfor endpoint paths intests/api/. - Identify gaps — Find endpoints with missing status code coverage.
- Generate test skeletons — Create test files using the fixture pattern.
- Prioritize — Data mutations (POST/PUT/DELETE) and auth endpoints first.
Output
Produce a coverage matrix and test file(s) ready to fill in with real endpoint details.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 21cb55e8644a
api-coverage-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ErkanBarin/playwright-agent-mcp-starter (43 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 512 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.