Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/evaluris-solutions/claude-active-directory/validatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Evaluris-Solutions/claude-active-directoryWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00362 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00181 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
validator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 44 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 2f1e57c32352
validator is an agent published in the GitHub repository Evaluris-Solutions/claude-active-directory (16 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 362 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ad-attack-planner
Reasons about low-privilege-to-Domain-Admin paths in an authorized Active Directory assessment. Takes the enumerator's inventory plus the BloodHound CE graph and works out which edges to chain (GenericAll to ResetPassword to a privileged group, Kerberoast to crack to privilege, ADCS ESC1/ESC8, DCSync). It plans and…
ad-exploit-operator
Executes ONE exploitation step from an approved attack plan in an authorized Active Directory assessment, invoking the matching technique skill (kerberos-attacks, adcs-attacks, acl-abuse, coercion-ntlm-relay) with the standard tool. Always asks for human confirmation before any action that modifies the directory…
ad-enumerator
Runs the COLLECTION phase of an authorized Active Directory assessment from a low-privilege domain account. Orchestrates standard tools (netexec/nxc, impacket, rusthound-ce or bloodhound-python, certipy) to enumerate users, groups, SPNs, interesting ACLs, ADCS templates and trusts, then returns a structured inventory…
lucy
RedTeam-Agent: AI-Powered Autonomous Red Team Framework via Model Context Protocol. AI红队与内网渗透自动化框架，支持 gogo, fscan, httpx, nuclei, impacket, playwright 等 15+ 渗透工具，让 LLM 直接化身安全审计黑客。.
supply-chain-auditor
Delegates to this agent when the user wants to audit software supply chain risk, generate or review an SBOM, hunt for dependency confusion and typosquatting exposure, inspect lockfile and package integrity, review install-time scripts in third-party packages, assess build and artifact provenance, or evaluate the blast…
compliance-mapper
Delegates to this agent when the user wants to map penetration-test findings to compliance frameworks — PCI DSS, NIST 800-53 / CSF, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, HIPAA, SOC 2 — produce control-gap analysis, and translate technical findings into compliance impact. Distinct from stig-analyst (STIG hardening) and…