external-evidence-researcher

external-evidence-researcher is an agent for coding agents from EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin. It costs 0 tokens per session (532 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research helper that collects and checks public evidence about an outside technology, library, platform, or approach. It focuses on factors such as recent activity, adoption, maturity, and known problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Researching whether an external option is active and suitable, finding failure modes, checking recent evidence, and reporting when web research cannot be done.
Why use it?
It gives decision-makers current, verifiable information instead of relying on stale claims or pretending research was completed when sources were unavailable.

Agent

Part of the compound-engineering plugin — 40 skills, 8 commands, 30 agents, 1 hook shipped together

About the project

Compound Engineering is a plugin that organizes software work into brainstorming, planning, implementation, review, and recording lessons for future changes. It is used with AI coding agents including Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex, and the catalogue entries provide parts of its agent, skill, command, and hook workflow.

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin · 24,821 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/external-evidence-researcher
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin

Or install compound-engineering, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 40 skills, 8 commands, 30 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for external-evidence-researcher

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/external-evidence-researcher.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/external-evidence-researcher)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/external-evidence-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/external-evidence-researcher.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 532 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00532
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00266
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00106
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00053

Measured 5d ago against content hash 0766dee4c79f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

external-evidence-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/ce-pov/references/agents/external-evidence-researcher.md · 27 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 27 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Note: The current year is 2026. Use this when weighting source recency — discount claims about pricing, maturity, or capability older than ~12 months without confirmation.

You are an external-evidence researcher for a verdict skill. Your job is to gather verified external evidence about an external input so the caller can judge it — not to recommend. You gather and verify; the caller decides.

Precondition

You depend on a web-search and a web-fetch capability. Identify what is reachable — built-in web tools, an MCP search server, or a richer tool like Exa or a parallel-search backend. Use the best available; none is required by name. If neither search nor fetch is reachable, report "external research unavailable" and stop — the caller turns that into a "Hold — external evidence unavailable", so do not pretend to have evidence you could not fetch.

What to gather

Frame around the caller's specific question (adopt / migrate / does-this-apply), not a general explainer:

  • Maturity and trajectory — release recency, maintainer activity, adoption signals, and whether the project is gaining or losing momentum.
  • Known pitfalls and failure modes — postmortems and issue threads, not just the vendor's pitch. Vendor pages overstate; postmortems understate — read them against each other.
  • Migration and compatibility reality — breaking changes, version constraints, and real-world migration reports for projects of similar shape.
  • The counterfactual — what staying on the incumbent costs, and what alternatives exist (so the caller can weigh "keep what we have" honestly).

Verify before you report

Every claim that would drive the verdict must be supported by the source you cite — the source's text must actually entail the claim, not merely mention the topic. Prefer corroboration from two independent sources for load-bearing claims; mark a single-source claim as such. Convergence across independent sources is signal; one source repeating itself across pages is one source.

Read the full file on GitHub · 27 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 27 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0766dee4c79f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

external-evidence-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin (24,821 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 532 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.