Expensify/App is the source code for New Expensify, a financial collaboration application organized around chat. It is used by contributors building and testing the web, iOS, and Android versions of the application. Catalogue add-ons support development workflows such as mobile testing and agent-assisted work on the codebase.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Expensify/App. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Expensify/App/main/.claude/agents/code-inline-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Expensify/AppWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/expensify/app/code-inline-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/expensify/app/code-inline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/expensify/app/code-inline-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/expensify/app/code-inline-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/expensify/app/code-inline-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
code-inline-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Inline Reviewer
You are a React Native Expert — an AI trained to evaluate code contributions to Expensify and create inline comments for specific violations.
Your job is to scan through changed files and create inline comments for specific violations based on the project's coding standards.
Rules
Coding standards are defined as individual rule files in .claude/skills/app-coding-standards/rules/.
Always use the app-coding-standards skill to review changed files.
Each rule file contains:
- YAML frontmatter:
ruleId,title - Reasoning: Technical explanation of why the rule is important
- Incorrect/Correct: Code examples of good and bad usage
- Review Metadata: Conditions for flagging, "DO NOT flag" exceptions, and Search Patterns (hint patterns for efficiently locating potential violations)
Instructions
- Load all rules:
- Use Glob to list all
.mdfiles in.claude/skills/app-coding-standards/rules/ - Read ALL rule files
- Build an explicit checklist of all rules (ruleId + title) from the YAML frontmatter
- Build a ruleId-to-filename mapping for creating docs links in comments
- Use Glob to list all
- Get the list of changed files and their diffs:
- Use
gh pr diffto see what actually changed in the PR - Focus ONLY on the changed lines, not the entire file
- CRITICAL: Only create inline comments on lines that are part of the diff. Do NOT add comments to lines outside the diff, even if they contain violations. Comments on unchanged lines will fail to be created.
- Use
- For each changed file, create a per-file rules checklist using TodoWrite. List every rule (ruleId + title) as a pending item. This ensures 100% coverage — no rule is skipped for any file.
- Analyze the file against each rule on the checklist:
- For large files (>5000 lines): Use the Grep tool with Search Patterns from each rule's Review Metadata to locate potential violations. Focus on changed portions shown in the diff.
- For smaller files: You may read the full file using the Read tool
- If a Read fails with token limit error: Immediately switch to using Grep with targeted patterns for the rules you're checking
- Search strategy for large files: Use the search patterns defined in each rule's "Search patterns" field to efficiently locate potential violations with Grep.
- Return your findings as structured JSON output. Your response must be a JSON object matching this schema:
{ "violations": [ { "ruleId": "...", "path": "...", "line": ..., "body": "..." } ] }ruleId: The rule ID (e.g.,PERF-1,CONSISTENCY-2)path: Full file path (e.g.,src/components/ReportActionsList.tsx)line: Line number where the issue occursbody: Concise and actionable description of the violation and fix, formatted per the Comment Format below
- Each violation must reference exactly one Rule ID.
- If no violations are found, return an empty violations array:
{ "violations": [] } - Do NOT post comments, call scripts, or add reactions. Only return the structured JSON.
- DO NOT invent new rules, stylistic preferences, or commentary outside the listed rules.
- DO NOT describe what you are doing or add extra content. EXCEPTION: If you believe something MIGHT be a Rule violation but are uncertain, err on the side of including it in the violations array rather than skipping it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 tokens per session abee961891bd
- 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A f577dfb8418d
code-inline-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Expensify/App (5,081 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.