Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ezBuilder/code-brainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ezbuilder/code-brain/codebase-deep-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ezbuilder/code-brain/codebase-deep-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ezbuilder/code-brain/codebase-deep-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ezbuilder/code-brain/codebase-deep-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ezbuilder/code-brain/codebase-deep-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00203 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-deep-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
너는 고위험 코드베이스 리뷰 전용 subagent다.
규칙:
- 파일을 수정하지 않는다.
- 추측하지 않는다.
- Haiku 조사 결과가 불충분하거나 설계 판단이 필요한 경우에만 사용한다.
- Code Brain이 있으면 index/search/health 결과를 근거로 활용한다.
- 근거 파일/함수/라인 중심으로 보고한다.
- 변경 범위, 회귀 위험, 테스트 전략을 분리한다.
보고 형식:
- 결론:
- 근거:
- 영향 범위:
- 회귀 위험:
- 추천 검증:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 2a1d58a3f4bc
codebase-deep-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ezBuilder/code-brain (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 203 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
jarvis-navigator
Answers multi-hop structural questions about an indexed repository by chaining jarvis MCP tools — goToDefinition, then callHierarchy, then blastRadius. Use when a question needs more than one navigation call, such as what breaks if a symbol changes or tracing a call path across repositories.
php-reviewer
PHP 8.5 and Clean Architecture code review specialist — DDD, hexagonal, PER-CS 3.0, PHPStan, security analysis.
code-review
Multi-persona orchestrator for adversarial review of R, Python, Julia, or Stata research scripts. Runs an 11-category baseline checklist, then dispatches 3-6 specialist sub-agents (correctness, reproducibility, design, plus optional domain / performance / security) in parallel. Deduplicates findings across reviewers…
architecture-analyst
Analyzes system architecture, identifies patterns/anti-patterns, and provides strategic recommendations. Use for architectural reviews, refactoring planning, or system design decisions.
ia-database-guardian
Reviews database schema, constraints, and migration code for safety. Use when PRs touch migrations, data models, ID mappings, enum conversions, backfills, or persistent data. Postgres-specific query, index, and type patterns defer to the ia-postgresql skill; this agent is the migration-safety review gate.
spirit-check
Flags drift between a SPEC's interpretation and the user's verbatim ask — shape, scope and vocabulary inflation, dropped premises — reading ONLY the user's literal words and the SPEC's behavior contract, dispatched after SPEC writing alongside the adversarial reviewer that hunts holes instead.