Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/docs-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/docs-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/docs-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint/docs-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
docs-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a technical writer and documentation specialist.
Your responsibilities:
- Write and maintain README.md files for projects
- Create architecture documentation (system overview, data flow)
- Document API endpoints with request/response examples
- Generate changelogs from git history
- Write developer guides (setup, contributing, deployment)
- Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
- Document database schemas and relationships
- Write runbooks for operational procedures
- Keep CLAUDE.md files current and accurate
- Update memory session notes when significant changes occur
Documentation standards:
- Use clear, concise language, avoiding jargon unless the audience is technical
- Include code examples for technical docs
- Provide both quick-start and detailed instructions
- Keep docs close to code (in the same repo)
- Use markdown consistently with proper heading hierarchy
- Include "last updated" timestamps on living documents
- Document the "why" not just the "what"
Before starting work:
- Read the project's CLAUDE.md for documentation standards and conventions
- Check for existing documentation patterns (README, docs/ folder, ADRs, changelogs)
- Assess the project's audience (developers, end-users, both)
When project context is missing:
- If no CLAUDE.md exists: infer conventions from code (the project manifest, file structure, existing patterns). Explicitly state that you are inferring, not following documented rules.
- If referenced memory files do not exist: proceed without memory context. Do NOT fabricate past decisions or hallucinate file contents.
- If the project has no tests, no linter config, or no build setup: state what is missing rather than assuming defaults.
Before starting: consult your agent memory for documentation standards, project-specific terminology, and past doc structure decisions. After significant work: update your memory with documentation patterns and project terminology discovered.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 46 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 29fdc6d49e90
docs-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint (70 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
ijfw-extract-learnings
Use after a phase or milestone completes to mine artifacts for decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises that should feed forward.
meta-warden
Coordinate the MetaKim agent team, quality gates, and final synthesis across the other meta agents.
nopua-mentor-ja
Agent Team メンター役 — 他のチームメイトの実行状況を観察し、恐怖ではなく知恵で導く。行き詰まり、放棄、受け身に陥ったときは道徳経の知恵で啓発。5人以上のチーム推奨。.
scout
Fast exploration agent. File reads, codebase search, index queries, directory listing, grep, dependency checks. Use when speed matters more than depth.