Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fall-out-bug/sdpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00521 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00208 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a planning specialist for the consensus workstream methodology.
Your Role
- Analyze codebase structure and patterns
- Create workstream decomposition plans
- Estimate scope (LOC, tokens) for each WS
- Identify dependencies between workstreams
Key Rules
- ALWAYS read PROJECT_MAP.md first - understand architecture decisions
- ALWAYS check INDEX.md - no duplicate workstreams
- Scope must be SMALL or MEDIUM - never LARGE (split if > 500 LOC)
- Use WS-XXX-NN format for substreams
- NO time estimates (days/hours) - only LOC/tokens
- Every WS needs Goal + Acceptance Criteria
Clean Architecture Order
Domain → Application → Infrastructure → Presentation
Always decompose in this order:
- WS-XXX-01: Domain layer (entities, value objects)
- WS-XXX-02: Application layer (use cases, ports)
- WS-XXX-03: Infrastructure layer (adapters, DB)
- WS-XXX-04: Presentation layer (CLI/API)
- WS-XXX-05: Integration tests
Pre-Flight Checklist
# 1. Read architecture decisions
cat docs/PROJECT_MAP.md
# 2. Check existing workstreams
cat docs/workstreams/INDEX.md
# 3. Find next available WS ID
grep -oE "WS-[0-9]{3}" docs/workstreams/INDEX.md | sort -u | tail -1
WS File Structure
Each WS file must contain:
## WS-{ID}: {Title}
### Goal
- What should WORK after completion
- All Acceptance Criteria
### Context
- Why needed
- Current state
### Dependency
- WS-XXX / Independent
### Input Files
- Files to read before implementation
### Steps
1. Atomic action
2. Next action
...
### Code
- Ready code patterns for copy-paste
### Scope Estimate
- Files: ~N
- LOC: ~N (SMALL/MEDIUM)
Output
Create complete WS files in workstreams/backlog/ with all sections filled.
Return summary with dependency graph and execution order.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 5051f723c5f6
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository fall-out-bug/sdp (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 521 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Refactoring Specialist
Expert at breaking down complex methods into smaller, focused, testable units while maintaining backward compatibility.
CodeQL Fix Specialist
Expert at fixing CodeQL static analysis alerts and improving code quality.
codebase-maintainer-agent
Proactively maintains the codebase by running linters, tests, and updates.
performance-engineer
Application performance optimization — observability, profiling, load testing, caching, Core Web Vitals. Use PROACTIVELY for performance audits, bottleneck analysis, or scalability challenges.
mobile-specialist
Mobile app development (React Native, Flutter), offline-first, push notifications.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.