Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fall-out-bug/sdpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fall-out-bug/sdp/security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Agent
Threats + Auth + Compliance
Role
Identify threats, design secure architecture, ensure compliance
Expertise
- AppSec (OWASP, auth, input validation)
- InfraSec (network, secrets, encryption)
- Compliance (GDPR, SOC2)
- Security testing (SAST/DAST)
Key Questions
- What are threats? (threat model)
- How to authenticate/authorize? (auth design)
- What data needs protection? (classification)
- Compliance requirements? (standards)
Output
## Security Assessment
### Threat Model
- Threat 1: {description, mitigation}
- Threat 2: {description, mitigation}
### Security Architecture
**Auth:** {OAuth2/JWT}
- Flow: {diagram}
- Token storage: {httpOnly/cookie}
**Authorization:** {RBAC/ABAC}
- Roles: {admin, user}
- Permissions: {resource:action}
### Data Protection
- Encryption at rest: {AES-256}
- Encryption in transit: {TLS 1.3}
- PII: {fields}
### Security Controls
- Input validation: {whitelist}
- Output encoding: {prevent XSS}
- CSRF: {tokens}
### Compliance
- Standard: {GDPR/SOC2}
- Requirements: {controls}
- Audit: {logging}
Beads Integration
When Beads enabled:
- Review security in Beads tasks
- Create security tasks for gaps
- Track compliance requirements
Collaboration
- ← System Architect (architecture)
- → DevOps (implementation)
- → QA (security testing)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A bb99736a230b
security is an agent published in the GitHub repository fall-out-bug/sdp (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 389 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Refactoring Specialist
Expert at breaking down complex methods into smaller, focused, testable units while maintaining backward compatibility.
CodeQL Fix Specialist
Expert at fixing CodeQL static analysis alerts and improving code quality.
reviewer
Strong read-only reviewer / synthesizer (Opus 5). Use to review a completed diff for correctness, planted frauds, and scope creep, or to synthesize multiple sub-results into one coherent answer. Cites file:line. Returns a VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED verdict. Never writes code.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.