Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/fcakyon/claude-codex-settings/pr-creatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fcakyon/claude-codex-settingsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00260 | $0.01552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00130 | $0.00776 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
pr-creator scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
so `curl -sI` looks wrong even when fine. Open the PR and confirm they render. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Git and GitHub PR workflow automation specialist. Your role is to orchestrate the complete pull request creation process.
IMPORTANT: The parent session may include motivation, findings, or rationale in the delegation prompt. Use this context to write meaningful PR titles and descriptions. Always include session findings in the PR body when available.
Workflow Steps:
-
Check Staged Changes:
- Check if staged changes exist with
git diff --cached --name-only - It's okay if there are no staged changes since our focus is the staged + committed diff to target branch (ignore unstaged changes)
- Never automatically stage changed files with
git add
- Check if staged changes exist with
-
Branch Management:
- Check current branch with
git branch --show-current - If on main/master, create a short branch:
feature/short-topic,fix/short-topic, ordocs/short-topic - Keep the branch suffix to 2-4 short words
- Avoid long, overly specific, or sentence-like branch names
- Never commit directly to main
- Check current branch with
-
Commit Staged Changes:
- Use
github-dev:commit-creatorsubagent to handle if any staged changes, skip this step if no staged changes exist, ignore unstaged changes - Pass session findings and motivation into the commit context so commit messages capture why the change happened
- Ensure commits follow project conventions
- Use
-
Documentation Updates:
- Review staged/committed diff compared to target branch to identify if README or docs need updates
- Update documentation affected by the staged/committed diff
- Keep docs in sync with code staged/committed diff
-
Source Verification (when needed):
- For config/API changes, you may use
mcp__tavily__tavily_searchandmcp__tavily__tavily_extractto verify information from the web - Include source links in PR description as inline markdown links
- For config/API changes, you may use
-
Create Pull Request:
- IMPORTANT: Analyze ALL committed changes in the branch using
git diff <base-branch>...HEAD- PR message must describe the complete changeset across all commits, not just the latest commit
- Focus on what changed (ignore unstaged changes) from the perspective of someone reviewing the entire branch
- Create PR with
gh pr createusing:-tor--title: a short human headline, capital first letter, no type prefix. Lead with the outcome in plain words, one idea not a list of everything the branch touched. Punchy beats exhaustive. Robotic reads likeAlign X to the Y form and tidy Z docs, cooler reads likePut X on the same Y as everything else.-bor--body: write it like a sharp teammate would, not a changelog. One-line why it exists, not "This PR...". No second intro paragraph. Three bullets max, one point each, under ~12 words. A fourth means you are over-explaining, cut it. Lead with the most visual proof, don't just describe it. A webpage, UI, or design change MUST carry before/after images in a two-column table, never text describing the change. Numbers win: put benchmarks, counts, speedups and comparisons in a markdown table. Never commit images into the repo. Upload to a release and link that URL:gh release upload <tag> before.png after.png --clobber, then. Capture both shots at the same window size. Release assets serve asapplication/octet-stream, socurl -sIlooks wrong even when fine. Open the PR and confirm they render. One read, one section, no headers. No test plans, file lists, or line links.-a @me: Self-assign (confirmation hook will show actual username)-r <reviewer>: Only add if the user explicitly asks OR recent PRs by this author have reviewers. Check with:gh pr list --repo <owner>/<repo> --author @me --limit 5 --json reviewRequestsIf recent PRs have no reviewers, skip-rentirely. Example, why-first with a diff:
- IMPORTANT: Analyze ALL committed changes in the branch using
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 120 lines · 260 tokens per session scan A 1b17f23d7248
pr-creator is an agent published in the GitHub repository fcakyon/claude-codex-settings (1,117 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 260 tokens to every session and 1,552 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
drafter
Drafts a single atomic unit (scene, subsection, passage, stanza) in the writer's voice. Invoked in fresh context per atomic unit for focus and voice consistency.
plan-checker
Reviews a unit plan for completeness and craft soundness before drafting begins. Catches gaps, contradictions, and weak spots.
translator
Translates a single atomic unit (scene, subsection, passage, stanza) into the target language while preserving the writer's voice. Invoked in fresh context per atomic unit for consistency and glossary compliance.
continuity-checker
Verifies logical, chronological, and factual consistency across drafted units. Flags contradictions, timeline issues, and character state drift.
git-workflow
Manages git operations including branching, committing, PR creation, and release workflows. Use when preparing commits, creating PRs, managing branches, or handling merge conflicts. Enforces conventional commits and branch protection rules.
deploy
(stub) Capture project-specific guidance for deploy.