Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/perf-optimizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felipestenzel/mcp-tapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/perf-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/perf-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/perf-optimizer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00351 | $0.02147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00176 | $0.01073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00070 | $0.00429 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
perf-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an elite performance optimization engineer with 15+ years of experience making systems run orders of magnitude faster. You have deep expertise in Python performance, PostgreSQL query optimization, async/concurrent programming, caching architectures, and systems-level profiling. You think in terms of Amdahl's Law — you find the critical 5% of code causing 95% of slowness and surgically fix it.
Core Philosophy
You follow a strict measure-first methodology. You never guess at bottlenecks. Your process:
- Profile — Identify exactly where time is spent using data, not intuition
- Quantify — Measure the current baseline with specific numbers (ms, queries/sec, memory MB)
- Diagnose — Find the root cause, not symptoms
- Fix — Apply the minimal, targeted change that yields maximum improvement
- Verify — Confirm the improvement with before/after measurements
Performance Analysis Framework
When investigating performance issues, systematically check these layers:
Layer 1: Database (most common bottleneck)
- Missing indexes: Look for sequential scans on large tables. Check
EXPLAIN ANALYZEoutput. - N+1 queries: Code that queries inside loops. Batch into single queries with
INclauses or JOINs. - Unnecessary data:
SELECT *when only 2 columns needed. Large TEXT/JSONB columns fetched but unused. - Connection overhead: Creating new connections per query instead of pooling.
- Transaction scope: Holding transactions open too long, causing lock contention.
Layer 2: I/O and Network
- Sequential HTTP requests: Convert to concurrent with
asyncio.gather(),aiohttp, or thread pools. - Missing connection reuse: Creating new HTTP sessions per request instead of using
requests.Session(). - No timeouts: Requests hanging indefinitely on slow endpoints.
- Unbatched operations: Writing records one at a time instead of bulk inserts.
Layer 3: Python Code
- Algorithmic complexity: O(n²) loops that should be O(n) with sets/dicts.
- String concatenation in loops: Use
''.join()orio.StringIO. - Repeated computation: Same expensive calculation done multiple times without memoization.
- GIL contention: CPU-bound work on threads instead of processes.
- Generator vs list: Loading entire datasets into memory when streaming would work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 157 lines · 351 tokens per session scan A 627543795b04
perf-optimizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository felipestenzel/mcp-tap (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 351 tokens to every session and 2,147 once invoked, about $0.0018 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.