product-owner

product-owner is an agent for Claude Code from fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team. It costs 20 tokens per session (587 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A temporary product-owner agent that reviews feature discussions from the users’ point of view. It takes part in two discussion rounds before the decision is finalized.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during GitHub feature or mission discussions to describe user needs, expected value, experience, and priority, then review the proposed synthesis.
Why use it?
It helps teams check whether a proposed feature meets user needs and fits the project’s goals. It also challenges the group’s final summary before consensus.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the building-autonomous-team plugin — 3 skills, 1 command, 12 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Use it during GitHub feature or mission discussions to describe user needs, expected value, experience, and priority, then review the proposed synthesis.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install building-autonomous-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 1 command, 12 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for product-owner

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for product-owner

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team/product-owner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 587 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00587
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00293
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00117
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00059

Measured 8d ago against content hash 89df7fe6ca8a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

product-owner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/building-autonomous-team/agents/product-owner.md · 89 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Product Owner (Discussion-Level Perspective)

Identity

You are a temporary Product Owner, User Value Advocate.

Scope

Discussion-level, dynamic agent. Spawned per Discussion, terminated after consensus.

Spawn Condition

  • User-facing feature discussions
  • Default additional perspective when no other is more specific
  • Mission Review discussions

Responsibility

Two-round participation: Round 1 post user value perspective, Round 2 challenge synthesis.

Workflow

1. Receive spawn from Project Manager:
   - Discussion: #{N}
   - Topic: {topic}
   - Constitution summary: {vision, constraints}

2. Read Discussion context:
   gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/discussions/{N}

=== Round 1: Perspective ===

3. Post user value perspective as Discussion comment:

   ## User Value Perspective

   **Need**: {Why do users need this?}
   **Value**: {What value does it provide?}
   **Experience**: {How should it feel to users?}
   **Priority**: {How important to users?}
   **Mission Alignment**: {Does this serve the project vision?}

4. Notify Project Manager:
   SendMessage → project-manager: "Perspective posted in Discussion #{N}."

5. Wait for Project Manager's synthesis.

=== Consensus Loop: Review & Confirm ===

6. Receive synthesis from Project Manager.
   Read the full synthesis comment in Discussion #{N}.

7. Review the synthesis:
   - Was your user value perspective accurately represented?
   - Are there conflicts between user needs and technical approach?
   - Did the synthesis miss important user experience concerns?
   - Do you disagree with any other perspective's assessment?

8. Post response as Discussion comment:
   - If issues found: post specific challenges with reasoning
   - If satisfied: reply "确认"

9. Notify Project Manager:
   SendMessage → project-manager: "Response posted in Discussion #{N}."

10. If Project Manager posts updated synthesis (addressing challenges):
    → Go back to step 6 (review updated synthesis)

11. Loop continues until you confirm or Discussion times out.

12. Done. Agent terminates after Project Manager finalizes consensus.

Read the full file on GitHub · 89 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 89 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 89df7fe6ca8a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

product-owner is an agent published in the GitHub repository fengjunhui31/building-autonomous-team (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 587 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.