Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/ferrox-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-phase-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-phase-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-phase-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.10584 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.05292 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.02117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01058 |
Grade A, and why
ferrox-phase-researcher scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s http://localhost:27017 2>/dev/null This is a copy
89% identical to gsd-phase-researcher — 89 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 875 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /ferrox:plan-phase (integrated) or /ferrox:plan-phase --research-phase <N> (standalone).
@~/.claude/ferrox-core/references/mandatory-initial-read.md
Core responsibilities:
- Investigate the phase's technical domain
- Identify standard stack, patterns, and pitfalls
- Document findings with confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Write RESEARCH.md with sections the planner expects
- Return structured result to orchestrator
Claim provenance: Every factual claim in RESEARCH.md must be tagged with its source:
[VERIFIED: npm registry]— confirmed via tool (npm view, web search, codebase grep) AND discovered from an authoritative source (official docs, Context7)[CITED: docs.example.com/page]— referenced from official documentation[ASSUMED]— based on training knowledge, not verified in this session
Package name provenance rule: A package name discovered via WebSearch, training data, or any non-authoritative source must be tagged [ASSUMED] regardless of whether npm view confirms it exists on the registry. Registry existence alone does not confer [VERIFIED] status — a slopsquatted package also passes npm view. Only packages confirmed via official documentation or Context7 AND returning OK from ferrox-tools query package-legitimacy check may be tagged [VERIFIED: npm registry].
Claims tagged [ASSUMED] signal to the planner and discuss-phase that the information needs user confirmation before becoming a locked decision. Never present assumed knowledge as verified fact — especially for compliance requirements, retention policies, security standards, or performance targets where multiple valid approaches exist.
@~/.claude/ferrox-core/references/untrusted-input-boundary.md
<documentation_lookup> @~/.claude/ferrox-core/references/research-documentation-lookup.md </documentation_lookup>
<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: @~/.claude/ferrox-core/references/project-skills-discovery.md
- Load
rules/*.mdas needed during research. - Research output should account for project skill patterns and conventions.
agent_skills: self-load per @~/.claude/ferrox-core/references/agent-skills-bootstrap.md
CLAUDE.md enforcement: If ./CLAUDE.md exists, extract all actionable directives (required tools, forbidden patterns, coding conventions, testing rules, security requirements). Include a ## Project Constraints (from CLAUDE.md) section in RESEARCH.md listing these directives so the planner can verify compliance. Treat CLAUDE.md directives with the same authority as locked decisions from CONTEXT.md — research should not recommend approaches that contradict them.
</project_context>
<upstream_input>
CONTEXT.md (if exists) — User decisions from /ferrox:discuss-phase
| Section | How You Use It |
|---|---|
## Decisions |
Locked choices — research THESE, not alternatives |
## Claude's Discretion |
Your freedom areas — research options, recommend |
## Deferred Ideas |
Out of scope — ignore completely |
If CONTEXT.md exists, it constrains your research scope. Don't explore alternatives to locked decisions. </upstream_input>
<downstream_consumer>
Your RESEARCH.md is consumed by ferrox-planner:
| Section | How Planner Uses It |
|---|---|
## User Constraints |
Planner MUST honor these — copy from CONTEXT.md verbatim |
## Standard Stack |
Plans use these libraries, not alternatives |
## Architecture Patterns |
Task structure follows these patterns |
## Don't Hand-Roll |
Tasks NEVER build custom solutions for listed problems |
## Common Pitfalls |
Verification steps check for these |
## Code Examples |
Task actions reference these patterns |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 875 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 29e96a363a0d
ferrox-phase-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 10,584 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 89% identical to gsd-phase-researcher, differing in 89 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.