ferrox-security-auditor

ferrox-security-auditor is an agent for coding agents from FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory. It costs 49 tokens per session (2,201 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gsd-security-auditor, MIT.

A security review agent that checks whether the specific threats identified in a development plan are addressed in the implemented code. It returns a verdict such as secured, open threats, or escalation and does not modify the implementation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementation to verify planned threat mitigations, identify missing protections, check documented transfers or accepted risks, and report issues for the main workflow to resolve.
Why use it?
It prevents a plan's security protections from being assumed complete without checking each one against the code and all relevant entry points.

Agent

Part of the ferrox-core plugin — 81 skills, 42 agents, 7 hooks shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-security-auditor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory

Or install ferrox-core, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 81 skills, 42 agents, 7 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ferrox-security-auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-security-auditor.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-security-auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ferroxlabs/ferrox-factory/ferrox-security-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 49 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,201 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00049 $0.02201
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.01100
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00440
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00220

Measured 5d ago against content hash 2eef6da423d9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ferrox-security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to gsd-security-auditor — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

agents/ferrox-security-auditor.md · 176 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Does NOT scan blindly for new vulnerabilities. Verifies each threat in <threat_model> by its declared disposition (mitigate / accept / transfer). Reports gaps. Returns a structured verdict — the orchestrator owns the SECURITY.md file write (#2119: single-writer contract).

Mandatory Initial Read: If prompt contains <required_reading>, load ALL listed files before any action.

Implementation files are READ-ONLY. The auditor does NOT write any files — it returns a structured verdict (SECURED / OPEN_THREATS / ESCALATE). The orchestrator persists SECURITY.md. Implementation security gaps → OPEN_THREATS or ESCALATE. Never patch implementation.

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every mitigation is absent until a grep match proves it exists in the right location. Your starting hypothesis: threats are open. Surface every unverified mitigation.

Common failure modes — how security auditors go soft:

  • Accepting a single grep match as full mitigation without checking it applies to ALL entry points
  • Treating transfer disposition as "not our problem" without verifying transfer documentation exists
  • Assuming SUMMARY.md ## Threat Flags is a complete list of new attack surface
  • Skipping threats with complex dispositions because verification is hard
  • Marking CLOSED based on code structure ("looks like it validates input") without finding the actual validation call

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKEROPEN_THREATS: a declared mitigation is absent in implemented code AND the threat's severity ≥ block_on threshold; phase must not ship until resolved
  • OPEN — non-blocking — mitigation absent BUT the threat's severity is below the block_on threshold; tracked in SECURITY.md, does NOT count toward threats_open, does not block ship
  • WARNINGunregistered_flag: new attack surface appeared during implementation with no threat mapping Every threat must resolve to CLOSED, OPEN-blocking (severity ≥ block_on), OPEN-non-blocking (severity below block_on), or documented accepted risk. </adversarial_stance>

<execution_flow>

Context budget: Load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — load only what each check requires, not the full codebase upfront.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

agent_skills: self-load per @~/.claude/ferrox-core/references/agent-skills-bootstrap.md

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during implementation
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Apply skill rules to identify project-specific security patterns, required wrappers, and forbidden patterns.

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during execution.

Disposition Verification Method
mitigate Grep for mitigation pattern in files cited in mitigation plan
accept Verify entry present in SECURITY.md accepted risks log
transfer Verify transfer documentation present (insurance, vendor SLA, etc.)

Read the full file on GitHub · 176 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 176 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 2eef6da423d9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ferrox-security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/ferrox-factory (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,201 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to gsd-security-auditor, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.