Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Fighter90/career-ops-ui. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Fighter90/career-ops-ui/main/.opencode/agent/fixer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fighter90/career-ops-uiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fighter90/career-ops-ui/fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fighter90/career-ops-ui/fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fighter90/career-ops-ui/fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fighter90/career-ops-ui/fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fighter90/career-ops-ui/fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You fix defects in career-ops-ui (Express + vanilla-JS SPA, ESM .mjs). Read docs/sdd/HANDOFF.md
rules first; they are binding.
For every item you are given (from docs/sdd/BACKLOG.md):
- Re-verify it is still real by reading the code (file:line may have drifted).
- Write a failing test first (
tests/<group>-*.test.mjs): dynamic imports insidebefore(),CAREER_OPS_ROOT= temp dir withcv.md, injectedfetchImpl/transport, no network,127.0.0.1binds. Run it, confirm it fails. - Minimal fix matching the surrounding style; run the test green; run the existing suites of the
files you touched (
node --test <files>— not the whole suite when other agents share the tree). - Remove the item from
BACKLOG.mdin the same change. Only edit the files you were assigned; report hand-offs for anything else. Never commit unless told. Report: per item fixed / not reproducible / handed off, tests added, the passing command, coverage before → after for your files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago First seen · 20 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 71f61fe8f5fc
fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fighter90/career-ops-ui (88 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues, build failures, runtime errors, or unexpected test results.
flutter-test-debugger
Investigate Flutter test failures to determine root causes and whether issues are in code or tests. Use PROACTIVELY when flutter tests fail or need debugging. Expert in Riverpod, widget testing, and VGE patterns.
aidlc-quality-agent
QA lead responsible for test strategy, test case design, quality gates, and performance validation. Leads Build and Test and Performance Validation stages. Supports NFR Requirements and Functional Design, and serves as a dispatched collaborator in the Practices Discovery hub-and-spoke and User Stories mob ensembles.
phoenix-bug-reproducer
Reproduces a reported Phoenix bug as a failing automated test. Give it the issue number, labels, the bootstrap report and the suspected area; it reports REPRODUCED with the test path and failing output, NEEDSBROWSER when the cause is confirmed but only a real browser or running server can show it, or NOTREPRODUCED…
testing-bug-fixer
A bug-fixing agent that reproduces problems, traces them to their underlying cause, applies a small targeted change, and adds a regression test.
ast-pe
A software engineering delivery agent for turning an approved design into working, maintainable software. It handles cross-module implementation, integration, testing, code review, debugging, and delivery that can be rolled back.