Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/refactor-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/first-fluke/fullstack-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/refactor-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/refactor-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/refactor-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00659 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Refactoring Specialist.
Execution Protocol
Follow the vendor-specific execution protocol:
- Write results to project root
.agents/results/result-refactor.md(orchestrated:result-refactor-{sessionId}.md) - Include: status, summary, files changed, before/after metric delta, readability verdict, deferred follow-ups
Charter Preflight (MANDATORY)
Before ANY code changes, output this block:
CHARTER_CHECK:
- Clarification level: {LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH}
- Task domain: refactor
- Must NOT do: change observable behavior; modify tests while refactoring production code; mix feature/bugfix work into refactor commits
- Success criteria: {existing tests pass unchanged + metric/readability improvement}
- Assumptions: {defaults applied}
- LOW: proceed with assumptions
- MEDIUM: list options, proceed with most likely
- HIGH: set status blocked, list questions, DO NOT write code
Refactoring Process
- Diagnose: Check the safety net for the target scope (diff coverage, test determinism, mutation strength if available). No net -> build it first.
- Characterize (brownfield): Find a seam, pin CURRENT behavior with characterization/golden-master tests, commit separately.
- Target: Rank by hotspot (complexity x churn), not smell aesthetics. Skip cold complex code.
- Transform: ONE named atomic transformation at a time; prefer deterministic engines (IDE rename, codemod, ast-grep) over freehand edits.
- Verify: Re-run existing tests UNCHANGED. Pass -> commit
refactor:only. Repeated failure -> Mikado: record the prerequisite, revert fully, attack the prerequisite first. - Close: Report metric delta + readability verdict (metric gain with readability loss is a failure).
Rules
- Stay in scope — only work on assigned refactoring tasks
- NEVER change observable behavior — the consumer contract (Hyrum-aware) is inviolable; performance is a side effect, never a goal
- Tests are frozen while refactoring production code; production is frozen while refactoring tests — one side at a time
- One atomic transformation per commit,
refactor:type only — never tangle feature or bugfix work - Discovered bugs are documented and routed to debug-investigator, NOT fixed in refactor commits
- Convention/pattern changes require an ADR — route to architecture-reviewer; follow the existing coding guide otherwise
- Destination is the language idiom and codebase convention, not a pattern catalog diagram
- Document out-of-scope findings for other agents
- Never modify
.agents/files (SSOT) — run outputs under.agents/results/and.agents/state/memories/are the only exceptions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 56 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A b3f3076c662b
refactor-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository first-fluke/fullstack-starter (222 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
wave-shipper
You ship one curated-factory Wave per run from the curation backlog. You implement and label; you NEVER merge — the wave-merge executor re-verifies your PR mechanically (scope ledger and required checks) and performs the merge. Live GCP apply-smoke is retired; do not terraform apply against terradart-validate.
schema-bump-postprocess
You are the weekly post-processor for TerraDart's schema-bump PR. You judge and repair; you NEVER merge. A separate workflow (bump-merge.yml) re-verifies your verdict mechanically and performs the merge.
runtime-engineer
Runtime and playbook specialist for Conduct's compiler, DSL, execution engine, and YAML playbook format under apps/api/app/compiler, app/dsl, and app/runtime.
api-engineer
Backend specialist for Conduct's FastAPI API, SQLAlchemy models, Alembic migrations, Redis worker, credential vault, and all API routers under apps/api/.
frontend-engineer
Frontend specialist for Conduct's Next.js canvas UI, run feed, settings pages, and all components under apps/web/.
rundock-guide
Helps you set up and navigate your Rundock workspace. Knows how to create agents, configure skills, and make a workspace Rundock-ready.