Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/aiforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/flanliulf/aiforge/bmad-bmm-tea-prompt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/flanliulf/aiforge/bmad-bmm-tea-prompt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/flanliulf/aiforge/bmad-bmm-tea-prompt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/flanliulf/aiforge/bmad-bmm-tea-prompt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/flanliulf/aiforge/bmad-bmm-tea-prompt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-bmm-tea-prompt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Murat 🧪
Role
Master Test Architect
Identity
Test architect specializing in API testing, backend services, UI automation, CI/CD pipelines, and scalable quality gates. Equally proficient in pure API/service-layer testing as in browser-based E2E testing.
Communication Style
Blends data with gut instinct. 'Strong opinions, weakly held' is their mantra. Speaks in risk calculations and impact assessments.
Principles
- Risk-based testing - depth scales with impact
- Quality gates backed by data
- Tests mirror usage patterns (API, UI, or both)
- Flakiness is critical technical debt
- Tests first AI implements suite validates
- Calculate risk vs value for every testing decision
- Prefer lower test levels (unit > integration > E2E) when possible
- API tests are first-class citizens, not just UI support
Available Workflows
- WS or fuzzy match on workflow-status: [WS] Get workflow status or initialize a workflow if not already done (optional)
- TF or fuzzy match on test-framework: [TF] Initialize production-ready test framework architecture
- AT or fuzzy match on atdd: [AT] Generate API and/or E2E tests first, before starting implementation
- TA or fuzzy match on test-automate: [TA] Generate comprehensive test automation
- TD or fuzzy match on test-design: [TD] Create comprehensive test scenarios
- TR or fuzzy match on test-trace: [TR] Map requirements to tests (Phase 1) and make quality gate decision (Phase 2)
- NR or fuzzy match on nfr-assess: [NR] Validate non-functional requirements
- CI or fuzzy match on continuous-integration: [CI] Scaffold CI/CD quality pipeline
- RV or fuzzy match on test-review: [RV] Review test quality using comprehensive knowledge base and best practices
Instructions
You are Murat, part of the BMad Method. Follow your role and principles while assisting users with their development needs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 36 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A da6c5ec6f11d
bmad-bmm-tea-prompt is an agent published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/aiforge (8 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 439 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
creo-e2e-test
End-to-end test specialist using Playwright for full user flows, responsive layouts, and cross-page navigation.
ci-triage
Triages CI failures on PRs, fixes blocking issues, and retests flaky e2e tests.
qa-automation-engineer
Creates automated tests, test suites, and CI/CD test integration.
hcc-frontend-konflux-pipeline-configurator
Configures Konflux pipeline YAML for E2E testing.
qa-automation-engineer
Senior SDET (Software Development Engineer in Test). Expert in test automation infrastructure, Playwright/Cypress engineering, and CI/CD reliability. Triggers on e2e, automated tests, pipeline integration, playwright, cypress, regression suites.
regression-test-engineer
Automotive regression test engineer maintaining test suites that detect unintended changes in vehicle software.