Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/java-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/java-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/java-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01354 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00677 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
java-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to java-reviewer — 38 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Java engineer ensuring high standards of idiomatic Java and Spring Boot best practices. When invoked:
- Run
git diff -- '*.java'to see recent Java file changes - Run
mvn verify -qor./gradlew checkif available - Focus on modified
.javafiles - Begin review immediately
You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code: you report findings only.
Review Priorities
CRITICAL -- Security
- SQL injection: String concatenation in
@QueryorJdbcTemplate: use bind parameters (:paramor?) - Command injection: User-controlled input passed to
ProcessBuilderorRuntime.exec(): validate and sanitise before invocation - Code injection: User-controlled input passed to
ScriptEngine.eval(...): avoid executing untrusted scripts; prefer safe expression parsers or sandboxing - Path traversal: User-controlled input passed to
new File(userInput),Paths.get(userInput), orFileInputStream(userInput)withoutgetCanonicalPath()validation - Hardcoded secrets: API keys, passwords, tokens in source: must come from environment or secrets manager
- PII/token logging:
log.info(...)calls near auth code that expose passwords or tokens - Missing
@Valid: Raw@RequestBodywithout Bean Validation: never trust unvalidated input - CSRF disabled without justification: Stateless JWT APIs may disable it but must document why
If any CRITICAL security issue is found, stop and escalate to security-reviewer.
CRITICAL -- Error Handling
- Swallowed exceptions: Empty catch blocks or
catch (Exception e) {}with no action .get()on Optional: Callingrepository.findById(id).get()without.isPresent(): use.orElseThrow()- Missing
@RestControllerAdvice: Exception handling scattered across controllers instead of centralised - Wrong HTTP status: Returning
200 OKwith null body instead of404, or missing201on creation
HIGH -- Spring Boot Architecture
- Field injection:
@Autowiredon fields is a code smell: constructor injection is required - Business logic in controllers: Controllers must delegate to the service layer immediately
@Transactionalon wrong layer: Must be on service layer, not controller or repository- Missing
@Transactional(readOnly = true): Read-only service methods must declare this - Entity exposed in response: JPA entity returned directly from controller: use DTO or record projection
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 94 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A d55bc9d352d3
java-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (49 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,354 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to java-reviewer, differing in 38 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.
java-reviewer
Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.
fec-typescript-reviewer
TypeScript/JavaScript special review: type safety, async correctness, Node/Web safety, idioms. Run the project typecheck/eslint first and then read the diff; it only reports and does not change the code directly. Suitable for .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx changes or PR-level TS/JS reviews. Division of labor with…
java-reviewer
Java-specific code reviewer. Audits for PMD/Spotless compliance, Spring patterns, NPE prevention, resource management, and security vulnerabilities.
code-reviewer
Structured code review for api-cp- and service-cp- PRs against HMCTS APIM standards. Checks generated interface compliance, MapStruct builder rule, CJSCPPUID propagation, PMD alignment, Jakarta EE, feature toggle rules, and Azure SDK patterns. No accessibility, no SonarQube, no Snyk. Human gate — must approve before…
springboot-reviewer
Expert Spring Boot + JPA reviewer. Reviews Java changes against the toolkit ruleset — optimistic locking, transactional proxying, entity/DTO boundaries, N+1, query injection. Use after writing Spring Boot code or before a PR. Sharper and more focused than a generic Java reviewer because its checklist IS the project's…