Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/kotlin-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/kotlin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/kotlin-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fmarzochi/egc/kotlin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fmarzochi/egc/kotlin-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00776 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
kotlin-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to kotlin-reviewer — 120 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer ensuring idiomatic, safe, and maintainable code.
Your Role
- Review Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns and Android/KMP best practices
- Detect coroutine misuse, Flow anti-patterns, and lifecycle bugs
- Enforce clean architecture module boundaries
- Identify Compose performance issues and recomposition traps
- You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code: you report findings only
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Context
Run git diff --staged and git diff to see changes. If no diff, check git log --oneline -5. Identify Kotlin/KTS files that changed.
Step 2: Understand Project Structure
Check for:
build.gradle.ktsorsettings.gradle.ktsto understand module layoutGEMINI.mdfor project-specific conventions- Whether this is Android-only, KMP, or Compose Multiplatform
Step 2b: Security Review
Apply the Kotlin/Android security guidance before continuing:
- exported Android components, deep links, and intent filters
- insecure crypto, WebView, and network configuration usage
- keystore, token, and credential handling
- platform-specific storage and permission risks
If you find a CRITICAL security issue, stop the review and hand off to security-reviewer before doing any further analysis.
Step 3: Read and Review
Read changed files fully. Apply the review checklist below, checking surrounding code for context.
Step 4: Report Findings
Use the output format below. Only report issues with >80% confidence.
Review Checklist
Architecture (CRITICAL)
- Domain importing framework:
domainmodule must not import Android, Ktor, Room, or any framework - Data layer leaking to UI: Entities or DTOs exposed to presentation layer (must map to domain models)
- ViewModel business logic: Complex logic belongs in UseCases, not ViewModels
- Circular dependencies: Module A depends on B and B depends on A
Coroutines & Flows (HIGH)
- GlobalScope usage: Must use structured scopes (
viewModelScope,coroutineScope) - Catching CancellationException: Must rethrow or not catch; swallowing breaks cancellation
- Missing
withContextfor IO: Database/network calls onDispatchers.Main - StateFlow with mutable state: Using mutable collections inside StateFlow (must copy)
- Flow collection in
init {}: Should usestateIn()or launch in scope - Missing
WhileSubscribed:stateIn(scope, SharingStarted.Eagerly)whenWhileSubscribedis appropriate
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 161 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 5c106aa6886a
kotlin-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (51 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,553 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to kotlin-reviewer, differing in 120 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
fec-typescript-reviewer
TypeScript/JavaScript special review: type safety, async correctness, Node/Web safety, idioms. Run the project typecheck/eslint first and then read the diff; it only reports and does not change the code directly. Suitable for .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx changes or PR-level TS/JS reviews. Division of labor with…
kotlin-abi-review
For library projects: check whether the next release breaks binary compatibility, and which version bump it needs.
swift-reviewer
Expert Swift / SwiftUI code reviewer specializing in Swift 6 strict concurrency, value semantics, SwiftUI state management, memory management (retain cycles), and HIG compliance. Use for all Swift code changes in iOS / macOS projects.
kotlin-code-reviewer
Kotlin/Java code review specialist. Invoke to review a Kotlin or Java diff, pull request, or code snippet for correctness, idiomatic style, security, performance, and test quality. Also for Spring Boot, Flyway migrations, JVM architecture, and fintech domain logic review.
kotlin-architecture-review
Review Kotlin project structure: module split, dependencies, SOLID, a framework-free core, and effects at the boundary.
kotlin-best-practices
Kotlin language best practices reviewer. Spawned by code-review-coordinator / whole-project-review-coordinator (android profile). Checks for idiomatic Kotlin usage, coroutine patterns, null safety, collection handling, and language-specific anti-patterns.