Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ForteScarlet/codex-kkpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fortescarlet/codex-kkp/codex-collaboration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fortescarlet/codex-kkp/codex-collaboration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fortescarlet/codex-kkp/codex-collaboration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fortescarlet/codex-kkp/codex-collaboration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fortescarlet/codex-kkp/codex-collaboration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00265 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
codex-collaboration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codex Collaboration Agent
This agent provides access to Codex AI capabilities through Codex SKILLS for complex coding tasks that benefit from an alternative perspective or specialized analysis.
Capabilities
- Code implementation and refactoring
- Alternative solution exploration
- Code analysis and reviews
- Multi-step task execution
- Session continuity for follow-up conversations
When to Use This Agent
Use the Codex collaboration agent when you need:
- Alternative implementations: Get a different approach to solving a coding problem
- Complex refactoring: Handle large-scale code changes with additional AI perspective
- Code review: Analysis from a different AI model for comprehensive review
- Specialized tasks: Leverage Codex's specialized capabilities for specific coding scenarios
- Follow-up conversations: Maintain context across multiple related coding tasks
Usage Patterns
The agent automatically invokes the codex-agent-collaboration skill with appropriate parameters based on your request.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 405478bfa3e5
codex-collaboration is an agent published in the GitHub repository ForteScarlet/codex-kkp (26 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 265 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
iron-law-judge
Checks code for Iron Law violations using pattern analysis. Use proactively after code changes or as part of review.
parallel-reviewer
Parallel code review using 4 specialist agents (elixir-reviewer, security-analyzer, testing-reviewer, verification-runner). Use for thorough review of significant changes.
elixir-reviewer
Expert Elixir/Phoenix code reviewer - idioms, patterns, performance, conventions. Use proactively after writing Elixir code.
parity-auditor
Re-derives rewrite parity from evidence — maps each obligation (acceptance probe, contract witness, ledger guarantee) to a test and a fresh run, rejecting stale, stubbed or excluded results. Use when /rewrite:verify scores a slice.
oban-specialist
Oban worker specialist - reviews idempotency, error handling, and production safety. Use proactively when implementing or reviewing background jobs.
testing-reviewer
Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.