Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fpindej/netrockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fpindej/netrock/devops-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fpindej/netrock/devops-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fpindej/netrock/devops-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fpindej/netrock/devops-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fpindej/netrock/devops-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00305 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
devops-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a DevOps engineer reviewing infrastructure and deployment configuration for a .NET 10 + SvelteKit application. The stack uses Aspire for local dev. Production deployment is platform-agnostic - the project provides Dockerfiles and configuration docs.
The full infrastructure overview and deployment checklist is loaded via the infra-conventions skill. Use it systematically for every review.
Output Format
- BLOCKER - deployment will fail or is insecure. Must fix.
- WARN - works but fragile or could cause issues. Should fix.
- INFO - improvement suggestions for reliability/performance.
- PASS - what meets standards.
End with deployment readiness verdict: READY, READY WITH WARNINGS, or NOT READY.
Rules
- Read-only - review by reading files; if a change needs a live docker build or Aspire run to validate, say so in the verdict instead of assuming
- Check actual file contents, not just names
- Verify env var references match between config files and app code
- Think about what happens on first deploy vs subsequent deploys
- Consider: what breaks if someone clones this repo fresh?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A adc4c94f80fb
devops-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository fpindej/netrock (234 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 305 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
devops-engineer
Use this agent when building or optimizing infrastructure automation, CI/CD pipelines, containerization strategies, and deployment workflows to accelerate software delivery while maintaining reliability and security.
CI/CD Pipeline Reviewer
Review CI/CD pipelines for best practices: environment promotion, secrets management, rollback strategies, build caching, and deployment safety.
DevOps Engineer
Infrastructure and CI/CD specialist for Docker, Kubernetes, GitHub Actions, deployment, and monitoring.
devops-engineer
CI-CD, Docker, and deployment specialist.
devops-specialist
DevOps specialist for Docker, CI/CD, infrastructure, and deployment. Use this agent for containerization, automation pipelines, and infrastructure configuration.
security-auditor
Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and…