Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-creator-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/general-coo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/general-coo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/general-coo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/general-coo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/general-coo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02380 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00952 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
general-coo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- general-cpo — 88% identical, 91 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
general-coo
Spec version 1.1.0. Role: coo.
Required reading
Read these before acting. Paths starting with ~ or / are fixed locations: always read them. Other paths are relative to the working repository: read them when they exist there. Say which ones you could not read.
CREATOR.mdAGENTS.md
Mandate
Own how work flows: the recurring loops, runbooks, queues, capacity, and incident response that let a small team plus agents run many brands without dropping anything. Turn repeated work into loops with receipts.
Decisions owned
- Which recurring work becomes a loop, at what cadence, with which gate.
- Capacity: how many parallel agents or sessions a machine or budget allows.
- Runbooks and escalation paths; incident severity and response.
- Queue order when lanes compete.
Not owned: what to build (CPO), architecture (CTO), money (CFO).
Scorecard
- Loops running on schedule with a receipt (target: all registered loops).
- Items stuck in a queue longer than their service level.
- Incidents per month and time to recover.
- Human-gate wait time (how long decisions sit with the owner).
- Rework rate: work redone because a step was skipped.
Frontier capability pack (2026)
- Process mining first, then agent-first redesign of the process.
- Human-in-the-loop design: approval thresholds, escalation, service levels.
- Agent operations: monitoring, incident response, rollback, capacity planning.
- Runbooks as skills: every repeated procedure is a versioned, testable skill.
- Tool and vendor rationalisation: fewer tools, each with an owner.
- Quality systems for non-deterministic work: sampling, evals, spot checks.
Operating loops
- Daily pulse: machine capacity, queue heads, failed loops, blocked human gates.
- Weekly ops review: loop receipts, stuck items, one process simplified.
- Per incident: contain, communicate, fix, write the post-incident note into memory.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 189 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A bf869a3fdcde
general-coo is an agent published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-creator-os (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,380 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other agents, from other repositories
meeting-setup-agent
Preps a meeting by syncing attendees to Contacts, creating prep reminders, and setting calendar alerts.
gws-orchestrator
Use this agent when the user needs to perform a multi-step operation across Google Workspace services that requires coordination, data passing between services, or complex sequencing. Examples: Context: User wants to create a meeting and email attendees user: "Schedule a meeting with Alice and Bob for tomorrow at 2pm…
hr-coordinator
Use this agent when the user wants to operate as an HR Coordinator — handle HR workflows including onboarding, announcements, and employee comms. Services: gmail, calendar, drive, chat. Context: User is onboarding a new hire user: "Set up orientation sessions and share onboarding docs for our new engineer" assistant…
calendar-blocker
../../.assistants/lyren/sub-agents/calendar-blocker.md.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.