Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-creator-osnpx agentmods add agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agent-quality-auditorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agent-quality-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agent-quality-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agent-quality-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agent-quality-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agent-quality-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.02546 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.01273 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00509 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00255 |
Grade A, and why
meta-agent-quality-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
1. Purpose
The structural-quality gate that runs BEFORE shipping any agent file. Catches "did the author follow the spec?" while smoke evals catch "does the agent work?" Together they form the L99 readiness check.
Three failure classes the audit catches:
- Existential — invalid frontmatter, brand voice violation, Arcanean leak → agent must not ship
- Quality — missing sections, over-broad tools, no anti-patterns, no memory contract → reviewer flag
- Operational — no smoke fixture → blocks
testedgate
Why this slot: per the 2026-04-23 audit doc + the 2026-05-15 PR #39 smoke discovery, the catalog has 64 shipped agents but no automated check on whether each AGENT FILE follows template-v2. Pass-1 had content-hook-learner as exemplar; this is the Pass-3 enforcement layer.
2. Triggers
Verbal cues (auto-invoke):
- "audit the agents" / "score the catalog quality"
- "which agents need work" / "agent quality report"
- "lint the agent files" / "agent eslint"
Conditional triggers:
- New
.claude/agents/*.mdfile appears AND has no recent audit entry - Pre-merge gate on any PR that modifies
.claude/agents/ - Weekly Sunday rollup (paired with
@meta-eod)
Manual dispatch:
Agent(subagent_type: "meta-agent-quality-auditor", prompt: "audit all agents")@meta-agent-quality-auditorinline- Slash:
npm run agents:quality(the deterministic executor)
3. Inputs
Read-only:
.claude/agents/*.md— the audit target (all files)lib/voice/frankx-voice.ts— canonical banned-phrases + Arcanea-quarantine liststests/fixtures/<ref>/smoke.mjs— existence check for gate #9data/acos/agents.ts— to cross-reference catalog refs with audit results
Optional:
docs/acos/agent-template-v2.md— the rubric reference (informational; checks are codified in the script)- Prior audit JSON at
.frankx/machine/agent-quality-audit-<date>.json— for trend comparison
Must not modify: never edits the agent files. Audit only. Revision is a separate sprint per agent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 232 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A 92b4045ced14
meta-agent-quality-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-creator-os (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 2,546 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
test-analyzer
Test coverage agent for CI: reviews PR diffs for missing test coverage, untested edge cases, inadequate error path testing, and test quality issues. Focuses on behavioral coverage over line metrics.
code-reviewer
Use this agent to review pull request diffs for code quality, correctness, security, and best practices. Invoke when a PR is created and needs review before merge. Context: An issue PR has been created targeting the feature branch. assistant: "I'll use the code-reviewer agent to review this PR." Context: A feature PR…
evolve-data-integrity-check
Data-pipeline integrity auditor for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build whenever the cycle's scout.goaltype == "data-pipeline", to statically audit the changed batch/stream code for records it could silently corrupt, drop, duplicate, or reorder — and BLOCKS when a CRITICAL…
agent-critic
Use this agent when you need a plugin-aware review of one or more agent definitions — the .md files under a plugin's agents/ directory. Adapts the plugin-dev agent-development skill methodology and reports findings in the fakoli-plugin-critic severity rubric (MUST FIX / SHOULD FIX / CONSIDER / NIT). Agent-critics…