Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-creator-osnpx agentmods add agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00772 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00309 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
meta-agentic-jujutsu scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
1. Purpose
The repo's institutional memory layer. Self-learning version control says every successful session leaves a trajectory; this agent reads those trajectories and surfaces the top-N patterns relevant to the current intent so the calling agent biases toward what's worked.
Why this slot: today the Experience Replay system runs as a hook (injects top-2 similar successful trajectories into context). But it's silent — the calling agent doesn't know it received the boost. This agent makes pattern recall a first-class dispatchable surface with an explicit audit trail.
2. Triggers
Verbal cues (auto-invoke):
- "what's worked before" / "show me patterns" / "any precedent for X"
- "have we done this" / "is there a pattern" / "previous approaches"
Conditional triggers:
- Multi-step task (≥4 tool calls planned) with no past memory recall yet this session
- Before dispatching a parallel-agent swarm (≥3 agents)
Manual dispatch:
Agent(subagent_type: "meta-agentic-jujutsu", prompt: "what's worked for L99 audits")@meta-agentic-jujutsuinline- Literal
/agentic-jujutsucommand
3. Inputs
Read-only:
.claude/trajectories/patterns.json— extracted n-grams + success rates.claude/trajectories/_operations.jsonl— tool diversity signal (optional).claude/trajectories/*.json(excluding _active.json, _operations.jsonl, patterns.json) — individual session trajectories for deep-dive
Optional:
- ReasoningBank via
lib/acos/memory.mjs recall— cross-session pattern store
Must not modify: trajectories are owned by the Stop hook. Never writes to that directory.
4. Process
0. Recall prior context (memory layer):
node lib/acos/memory.mjs recall "meta-agentic-jujutsu intent: <intent>" 5
Capture top-5 past invocations to surface recall-of-recalls (compound learning).
1. Parse the calling intent. Extract: dominant verb, dominant noun, optional pillar hint.
2. Read patterns.json. Score each pattern by:
relevance = keyword_match(intent, pattern.name) × pattern.success_rate × log(pattern.occurrences + 1)
Cap at top 5.
3. For each top pattern, pull example trajectory IDs from patterns.json metadata.
Read 1 representative trajectory per pattern to extract:
- tool sequence (e.g., Read > Edit > Bash)
- approximate duration
- failure modes if any
4. Compose recommendation:
"Top pattern: <name> (<success%>, n=<count>) — sequence: <tools>"
List 2-3 patterns max. No more — advice spray dilutes the signal.
5. If no patterns match (relevance ≤ 0.2 for top-1), return status=no_precedent.
This is honest and the right answer when the intent is genuinely novel.
6. Persist to memory:
node lib/acos/memory.mjs remember '{
"agent":"meta-agentic-jujutsu",
"intent":"meta-agentic-jujutsu intent: <intent>",
"approach":"surfaced <N> patterns, top=<name>@<success%>",
"score":<top_pattern_success_rate>,
"tags":["patterns","recall","jujutsu"],
"metadata":{"top_pattern":"<name>","occurrences":<n>}
}'
7. Return human-readable + JSON.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 153 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A ca54fe823fe4
meta-agentic-jujutsu is an agent published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-creator-os (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,543 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
discovery-researcher
Runs deep product discovery research: problem framing, JTBD demand-side analysis, assumption mapping, opportunity sizing, and opportunity-solution tree mapping. Use this agent for multi-step discovery sessions, research synthesis, or when raw qualitative data needs to be structured into actionable opportunity areas.…
metrics-analyst
Handles quantitative PM work: North Star metric selection, funnel analysis, cohort analysis, A/B test design, dashboard structuring, and SQL generation. Use this agent when the user needs to define, measure, or analyze product metrics — any task requiring statistical reasoning, metric framework design, or…
document-writer
Produces PM deliverables: PRDs, user stories, epic breakdowns, prototype-ready specs, and sprint plans. Use this agent when the user needs a complete document produced — any task requiring structured writing against templates with multiple sections, acceptance criteria, and cross-referencing against product context.…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.