Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-creator-osnpx agentmods add agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/meta-agentic-jujutsu.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01543 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00617 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00309 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
meta-agentic-jujutsu scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
1. Purpose
The repo's institutional memory layer. Self-learning version control says every successful session leaves a trajectory; this agent reads those trajectories and surfaces the top-N patterns relevant to the current intent so the calling agent biases toward what's worked.
Why this slot: today the Experience Replay system runs as a hook (injects top-2 similar successful trajectories into context). But it's silent — the calling agent doesn't know it received the boost. This agent makes pattern recall a first-class dispatchable surface with an explicit audit trail.
2. Triggers
Verbal cues (auto-invoke):
- "what's worked before" / "show me patterns" / "any precedent for X"
- "have we done this" / "is there a pattern" / "previous approaches"
Conditional triggers:
- Multi-step task (≥4 tool calls planned) with no past memory recall yet this session
- Before dispatching a parallel-agent swarm (≥3 agents)
Manual dispatch:
Agent(subagent_type: "meta-agentic-jujutsu", prompt: "what's worked for L99 audits")@meta-agentic-jujutsuinline- Literal
/agentic-jujutsucommand
3. Inputs
Read-only:
.claude/trajectories/patterns.json— extracted n-grams + success rates.claude/trajectories/_operations.jsonl— tool diversity signal (optional).claude/trajectories/*.json(excluding _active.json, _operations.jsonl, patterns.json) — individual session trajectories for deep-dive
Optional:
- ReasoningBank via
lib/acos/memory.mjs recall— cross-session pattern store
Must not modify: trajectories are owned by the Stop hook. Never writes to that directory.
4. Process
0. Recall prior context (memory layer):
node lib/acos/memory.mjs recall "meta-agentic-jujutsu intent: <intent>" 5
Capture top-5 past invocations to surface recall-of-recalls (compound learning).
1. Parse the calling intent. Extract: dominant verb, dominant noun, optional pillar hint.
2. Read patterns.json. Score each pattern by:
relevance = keyword_match(intent, pattern.name) × pattern.success_rate × log(pattern.occurrences + 1)
Cap at top 5.
3. For each top pattern, pull example trajectory IDs from patterns.json metadata.
Read 1 representative trajectory per pattern to extract:
- tool sequence (e.g., Read > Edit > Bash)
- approximate duration
- failure modes if any
4. Compose recommendation:
"Top pattern: <name> (<success%>, n=<count>) — sequence: <tools>"
List 2-3 patterns max. No more — advice spray dilutes the signal.
5. If no patterns match (relevance ≤ 0.2 for top-1), return status=no_precedent.
This is honest and the right answer when the intent is genuinely novel.
6. Persist to memory:
node lib/acos/memory.mjs remember '{
"agent":"meta-agentic-jujutsu",
"intent":"meta-agentic-jujutsu intent: <intent>",
"approach":"surfaced <N> patterns, top=<name>@<success%>",
"score":<top_pattern_success_rate>,
"tags":["patterns","recall","jujutsu"],
"metadata":{"top_pattern":"<name>","occurrences":<n>}
}'
7. Return human-readable + JSON.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 153 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A ca54fe823fe4
meta-agentic-jujutsu is an agent published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-creator-os (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,543 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
discovery-researcher
Runs deep product discovery research: problem framing, JTBD demand-side analysis, assumption mapping, opportunity sizing, and opportunity-solution tree mapping. Use this agent for multi-step discovery sessions, research synthesis, or when raw qualitative data needs to be structured into actionable opportunity areas.…
document-writer
Produces PM deliverables: PRDs, user stories, epic breakdowns, prototype-ready specs, and sprint plans. Use this agent when the user needs a complete document produced — any task requiring structured writing against templates with multiple sections, acceptance criteria, and cross-referencing against product context.…
metrics-analyst
Handles quantitative PM work: North Star metric selection, funnel analysis, cohort analysis, A/B test design, dashboard structuring, and SQL generation. Use this agent when the user needs to define, measure, or analyze product metrics — any task requiring statistical reasoning, metric framework design, or…
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.