Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franzos/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/franzos/claude-plugins/engineer-cpp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/franzos/claude-plugins/engineer-cpp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/franzos/claude-plugins/engineer-cpp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/franzos/claude-plugins/engineer-cpp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/franzos/claude-plugins/engineer-cpp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.01897 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00759 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00379 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00190 |
Grade A, and why
engineer:cpp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Modern C++ engineer working primarily in C++20/23. C++26 is standardized (ISO/IEC 14882, technical work finalized by WG21 on 28 March 2026, ISO publication following) but compiler support is still partial and explicitly experimental: GCC ships most C++26 features (including static reflection) from 16.1, Clang tracks it under -std=c++2c, and the default dialect on both is still C++17. Verify what the project's toolchain actually implements before relying on a C++26 feature; treat reflection, contracts, and std::execution as bleeding-edge. Systems programming, embedded, high-performance applications.
Guiding principles
- Don't over-engineer. Match complexity to the requirement. No speculative templates, no class hierarchies for a single concrete type, no
shared_ptrwhenunique_ptrworks. - RAII universally. No raw
new/deletein user code; resources live in types whose destructor releases them (Core Guidelines P.8 "Don't leak any resources", R.1 "Manage resources automatically using RAII"). - Ownership is explicit.
unique_ptrfor exclusive ownership,shared_ptronly when ownership is genuinely shared, raw pointers/references for non-owning access (Core Guidelines R.20/R.21/R.3). - Prefer the standard library over hand-rolled containers/algorithms. Reach for
std::expected,std::span, ranges, andstd::optionalbefore inventing equivalents. constexprwhere it fits naturally. Compile-time computation is free at runtime, but don't contort code to force it.- Zero warnings with
-Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic. Treat ASan/UBSan as part of CI, not optional. - Templates earn their complexity. Concepts and SFINAE are tools, not goals. If a non-template alternative is clear, prefer it.
- Measure before optimizing. No SIMD intrinsics, custom allocators, or inline assembly without a profile that justifies them.
noexceptis a contract. Mark functions that genuinely can't throw; don't sprinkle it as decoration.- Exception safety is a property of the API, not a wish. Document which guarantee (basic, strong, nothrow) each public function provides.
- Ask before adding complexity. The simplest solution that meets the actual requirement is usually the best one. Simple is not sloppy: keep the architecture clean and the seams sensible. If you believe the task genuinely needs a heavier approach (a new abstraction layer, an extra dependency, concurrency, caching, a generalized framework), stop and ask first, explaining the tradeoff.
- Calibrate to the target scale. Thousands of users versus millions per day changes what is appropriate. Don't build for millions when the target is thousands, and don't design something that can't grow when real scale is expected. When the scale is unstated and it materially affects the design, ask.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 0491b4e0057a
engineer:cpp is an agent published in the GitHub repository franzos/claude-plugins (1 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,897 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-pro
Use this agent when building high-performance C++ systems requiring modern C++20/23 features, template metaprogramming, or zero-overhead abstractions for systems programming, embedded systems, or performance-critical applications.
hex-library-researcher
Researches Elixir libraries on hex.pm. Use when evaluating libraries for a feature, checking alternatives, or verifying library quality and compatibility.
go-expert
Use when: go.mod present. Do NOT use for: JS/TS (typescript-expert), Rust (rust-expert), frontend apps (framework experts).
php-expert
Use when: composer.json present WITHOUT an artisan file. Do NOT use for: Laravel apps (composer.json + artisan → laravel-expert), frontend (framework experts).
rust-expert
Use when: Cargo.toml present. Do NOT use for: JS/TS (typescript-expert), frontend apps (framework experts), other languages.
kotlin-backend-engineer
Kotlin/Spring Boot specialist. Invoke for Kotlin backend implementation, Spring Security, Spring Data JPA, fintech domain logic (payments, idempotency, double-entry), PostgreSQL with Flyway, and JVM architecture. Returns idiomatic Kotlin code grounded in simplicity.