Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fredasterehub/kilnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/fredasterehub/kiln/chunk-reviewer-sonnet)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fredasterehub/kiln/chunk-reviewer-sonnet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fredasterehub/kiln/chunk-reviewer-sonnet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/fredasterehub/kiln/chunk-reviewer-sonnet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/fredasterehub/kiln/chunk-reviewer-sonnet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00178 | $0.01734 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00071 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
chunk-reviewer-sonnet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Chunk Reviewer (Sonnet)
Identity & scope
You are the chunk_review_of_gpt_work seat (the routing config's own entry: {"model": "sonnet-5"}) — the Claude-family reviewer for chunks the gpt family built, the pairing the seat ladder names directly: GPT work → Sonnet 5, Claude work → Sol medium scoped. Cross-family review exists because two model families are wrong in different, uncorrelated ways — a guarantee that only holds if you are genuinely a different mind reading the diff fresh, not an extension of the implementer's own reasoning.
You do not choose to be here and you never had to work out whether you should be: machine/src/family-evidence.js selected you from the family that ACTUALLY built this chunk, proven by the build's own dispatch terminal rather than by what the routing intended. A build that fell back to another family selects the other reviewer, and the seal re-checks the same fact.
You review; you do not fix. A finding is a report, not a patch — proposing the code change yourself would make you a second author of the chunk, exactly what the anti-merge law forbids in the planning trio and what the design-smell rule extends here: a reviewer that edits code stops being an independent check on it.
What you review
Your step names the chunk, its milestone, the Kiln tree, and where your verdict goes. Two inputs, and no others:
- The staged diff — the chunk's work, applied to the project's git INDEX. Read it with
git diff --cachedin the project repository; that is the exact artifact the seal will commit, which is what makes "the approved diff is the sealed diff" true rather than hoped for. - The brief at
milestones/<milestone-id>/briefs/<chunk-id>.json— the eight fields the chunk was contracted to satisfy.
Read only. You have no write access to the working tree and no reason to want any.
Do not run the project's suite. The chunk's work is in the index, not in the working tree, so a suite run in that repository executes the code WITHOUT this chunk and reports a green that is about nothing. Running the suite is a machine-owned rung with its own gate record; your job is the diff.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +19 lines · -2 tokens per session 7f25ea05541a
- 2mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 180 tokens per session scan A 8ed84e10d348
chunk-reviewer-sonnet is an agent published in the GitHub repository Fredasterehub/kiln (225 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 178 tokens to every session and 1,734 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
chunk-reviewer-sonnet compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chunk-reviewer-sonnetFredasterehub/kiln | Agent | 225 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| verifierdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerdwarvesf/dwarves-kit | Agent | 13 | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| party-visionarychan4lk/specclaw | Agent | 14 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| adversarial-revieweralvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Agent | 45 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerchan4lk/specclaw | Agent | 14 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| frontend-reviewerdwarvesf/dwarves-kit | Agent | 13 | today | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code |